User talk:Something X
Pirate Party of Canada[edit]
Hi
Pirate Party of Canada was deleted because it made no claim of importance as to why it should be in an encyclopedia. If you can find two independent newspapers that wrote about it, that will prove that it should be in here! If you want what you wrote back, I can put it at User:Something X/Pirate Party of Canada. Let me know if you want that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have restored that article to the subpage. Please add your references and expand itto see if it can make a main space article Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your edits because the Pirate Party of Canada isn't registered according to Elections Canada. They're only eligible for registration. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 06:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
A kitten for you![edit]
Exposing the truth about Hanuman, well done.
Psychotius (talk) 18:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hanuman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
November 2011[edit]
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Hanuman, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Not agreeing with another editor does not make them vandals Muhandes (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
May 2012[edit]
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at CJSB-FM, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Neutralhomer • Talk • 18:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 18:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)