User talk:Sonees

Welcome!

Hello, Sonisoni, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How does X work?[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have created the page sandeep pampally. Now, I am notified that the page is going to be removed. I believe I followed all the instructions while creating the page. It contains external references too as the page relates to a living person. Please advice me, in which way I disobeyed the guidelines of wikipedia while creating that article. Thank You. Sonisoni (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any deletion tags on the current article or in the history. Where were you notified of this? It could use some extra sources, if possible, and the external links that link to independent sources need to be turned into citations. There is information on how to do that here, if you want to give it a try. Going to remove the helpme tag, but I'll keep an eye on this page if you have any further questions. You can also contact me on my talkpage if you want. ^OohBunnies! Leave a message 11:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lorry Girl[edit]

The article Lorry Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, not a feature film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Anish Viswa 11:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sonees. You have new messages at Mark Arsten's talk page.
Message added 14:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mark Arsten (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looked over Lorry Girl[edit]

Hi! I sort of decided to intrude and do a little minor editing with the article you currently have up for AfC. I didn't approve it and since I have done some editing, I would be unable to approve it in the future. I noticed that there were some issues with the article.

First off, the article had some issues with tone. If it were just an article for a newspaper or for a personal blog, there would be no issue with tone. However, at times the article reads more like a personal blog or essay than a neutral article. Phrases like "This short film is one of social impedance that shares a message to the modern society" need to be very carefully added, as this comes across more as the personal opinion of the person who wrote the article. If this is the opinion of the director then you can put it in, but you must write it along the lines of "Pampally has stated that he views the film as an essential message to modern society about AIDS" or something along those lines. Lines such as "Definitely Kannan is be a breaking character in his career." should be absolutely avoided at all costs because this is an opinion and opinions of this nature have no place in a Wikipedia article. This is also considered to be WP:OR and a little bit of fortune telling because you don't know for certain that this will be the breaking character of his career. It's just as likely that this will not be considered as such by many critics. You just don't know and you can't make predictions like that even if it seems likely. The character section as a whole looks like it would need to be drastically re-written for tone and NPOV.

Secondly, I moved the sources up to the article space. This might be minor, but sourcing should be in the article as a whole. Just kind of mentioning this offhand. You don't absolutely positively have to put the sources as in-line cites, but it is considered to be the norm and unfortunately there are a lot of editors out there that might disregard an article because the sources aren't in-line cites. It's not fair, but it happens.

Thirdly, we don't need a list of every place the film has screened. In other words, the "Preview on World Aids Day" section doesn't really need to be as large as it is. The opening sentence of the section is really all that is needed. We can mention one or two of the biggest cities, but overall we don't need a rundown of each location. Being shown in various locations isn't always something that gives notability. Notability almost always comes down to an issue of sourcing, which was something else that I was slightly worried about.

Most of the sources in the article seem to predominantly be brief blurbs that the movie will screen in various locations, but there is a lack of articles that actually review the film or go into any depth about it. I think that it might be too soon for this to have an article on the mainspace just yet. It's close, but not quite there yet. If you could find two reviews in reliable sources, then I'd be willing to argue that the film could fall under part one of WP:NFILM.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lorry Girl.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! JHUbal27 (talk) 22:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lorry Girl concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lorry Girl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lorry Girl concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lorry Girl, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lorry Girl has been accepted[edit]

Lorry Girl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 04:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandeep Pampally for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandeep Pampally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Pampally until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 09:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shibu G Suseelan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Shibu G Suseelan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 06:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shibu G Suseelan (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shibu G Suseelan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shibu G Suseelan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 09:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sonees! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 09:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shibu G Suseelan[edit]

Hello, Sonees. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shibu G Suseelan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]