User talk:SoodVaishali

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using sources that don't come close to WP:RS guidelines[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sharing a reliable source for adding the 52 sub castes. Please peruse and approve the addition and let me know if it matches the WP:RS Guidelines. SoodVaishali (talk) Vaishali Sood 0226 29 MarchSoodVaishali (talk)

You didn't include that source with any of your edits. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights, proper referencing[edit]

Please review WP:CITE. The correct way to cite your source would be something like this: <ref name="originHistory">{{cite book|title=Origin And History Of Soods (A community in India)|first1=Yaman|last1=Sood|year=1975|publisher=Sood Sabha Chandigarh|url=http://soodsabhachandigarh.org/history.html#2|accessdate=2020-03-30}}</ref>. If you want to reuse the same reference elsewhere in the article, you can simply add this to the end of the text: <ref name="originHistory"/>; that will call the original ref by name.
Please read this policy on copyrights and copy-pasting text. I've removed your last additions because they were largely directly copied from the cited URL. You'll need to add content that you've rewritten in your own words if you want to include it in Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March when I re-wrote in my own words, you removed that too. So I am confused. I am new and unable to cite my source. Can you do it for me please ? Otherwise I will learn by hit and try. I know very basic html. Thanks in advance. WHY have you removed my list of new entries to the Notable Soods ? SoodVaishali (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Vaishali Sood 30 March 20 2100 HoursSoodVaishali (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just showed you above how to cite a source. You can copy/paste that; just don't copy-paste content. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Example from above: <ref name="originHistory">{{cite book|title=Origin And History Of Soods (A community in India)|first1=Yaman|last1=Sood|year=1975|publisher=Sood Sabha Chandigarh|url=http://soodsabhachandigarh.org/history.html#2|accessdate=2020-03-30}}</ref>

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tikshan Sud has been accepted[edit]

Tikshan Sud, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anjanna Kuthiala (May 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjanna Kuthiala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anjanna Kuthiala, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SoodVaishali! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upneet Lalli (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:REFBOMBing the article with links to things the subject has written does not demonstrate notability. We need to see WP:SIGCOV of the subject in reliable, secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Upneet Lalli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Upneet Lalli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishi Raj Sood (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Antila was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rishi Raj Sood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rishi Raj Sood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Antila (✉) 06:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anjanna Kuthiala (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjanna Kuthiala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anjanna Kuthiala, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SOOD community/surname[edit]

Hi User:Ohnoitsjamie, You have completed deleted the article on Sood community which had verified citations and supported with verifies sources. Also, many Soods have been deleted from the list of notables which new list has now have been frozen by yourself. This very disheartening especially after the relentless hours of labor put in by me to support the article with reliable sources. Could u pls help me understand. VS 17:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)SoodVaishaliVS 17:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC) 22:27 IST[reply]

This belongs on Talk:Sood. You're going to need to address Sitush's comments; namely, that the article about the caste was already deleted by consensus, and that the sourcing was inadequate for the material added. Your best course of action might be to go through the WP:AFC process with a target like Sood (community), where your sources will be better vetted. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upneet Lalli (August 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As none of what the subject wrote is notable, those can't be used as citations for notability purposes. We need significant coverage about her.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Upneet Lalli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Upneet Lalli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Upneet Lalli[edit]

Hi ! User:Chris troutman, Please refer to reference 43. It talks about the subject Upneet Lalli sufficiently and so many other press releases that announce her work or photo exhibition or books, do talk about her. She is clearly a notable person. Social service is a dull field. Its not Hollywoood. People do not crave to read about social service hence due to the nature of the job, coverage in newspapers is small. Social workers are not politicians or movie stars. Notability on the basis of equal press coverage cannot be compared across all sectors of work or life. 20:20, 3 December 2020 (Indian Standard Time) VS 14:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)SoodVaishaliVS 14:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rishi Raj Sood[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rishi Raj Sood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of Draft:Rishi Raj Sood[edit]

Hi ! User talk:Celestina007 Request you to please undo the delete of the article so I can work on it. I clicked on the undelete but article has been lost. I cant see the primary article anymore. Need help here. 20:40, 3 December 2020 IST talk 15:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)SoodVaishalitalk 15:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Sacred Heart School, Dalhousie[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Sacred Heart School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 12:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anjanna Kuthiala[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anjanna Kuthiala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rishi Raj Sood[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rishi Raj Sood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upneet Lalli (July 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Upneet Lalli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Upneet Lalli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 22:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anjanna Kuthiala[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anjanna Kuthiala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Sacred Heart School, Dalhousie[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Sacred Heart School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Upneet Lalli[edit]

Hello, SoodVaishali. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Upneet Lalli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]