User talk:SophieKazandjian

This is SophieKazandjian's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Stokes (March 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like a fluff piece and lacks the independent coverage necessary for inclusion (and had several copyright violations.) The sentence in the lead "among his publications...is the most cited" seems like an attempt to establish notability but doesn't give any indication of where it is the most cited. Is it in space? On Livejournal? On Wikipedia? It appears he's "most cited" in a series of (3?) random books, which doesn't really indicate much of anything. Citations: 6, 7, 8) are all pieces he has authored or co-authored, 3, 4, 5) are vague references to being cited in non-notable papers/books and gscholar 2, 1) are just his faculty "profiles" and offer no actual insight or coverage of him.

--SophieKazandjian (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Thank you for taking the time to read the draft article. Actually, Stokes has over 183 citations for his Unconscious At Work chapter in books and journals. However, I read that listing them all would make the layout of the article appear untidy, so I wasn't sure how to indicate the volume of citations. It certainly isn't a mere three mentions. If you have any advice on how this could be done, it would be very much appreciated.[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jon Stokes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jon Stokes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SophieKazandjian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jon Stokes[edit]

Hello, SophieKazandjian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jon Stokes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 18:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]