User talk:Sotirisdim4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to IPad Mini (2nd generation) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was hacked! Before you say bullshit though, think about it, I have a weak password... After all those contributions I offered to Nintendo 3DS system software and others, do you really think I was going out of my way to do stuff on wikipedia? Like let's be honest, I don't think a person who makes so many contributions to one website, why whould he/she go out of their way and vandalize the page? To prove that this is not a fake claim for a hack, I was hacked on other sites as well like reddit, but just bit the bullet and acted like it was my fault to get over this quicker... But on wikipedia it's so hard to get unbanned so I needed to tell the truth. Proof I got banned on reddit for something my hacker did http://imgur.com/a/kvMzh . So I just bit the bullet and acted like I was the troublemaker to get it over with more quickly!Sotirisdim4 (talk) 8:01 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Blaming the behavior on someone else isn't an acceptable unblock request, because administrators have no way of verifying it (and the image you've linked is not evidence). In other words, your account cannot be unblocked because it may be compromised. I JethroBT drop me a line 01:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I'll be honest, I lied, I have never pushed this so hard... I seriously promise to always follow the rules from now on and not go on random talk pages and changing their block appeals and faking to be someone I'm not (For example, when I disguised as Sandra's husband)! I am so sorry, I should have known better and I am not asking for an instant unban, I think a 1 month block would suit me as I need to learn my lesson... Lying is obviously never the answer. I am sincerely sorry and I seriously PROMISE to never do this again!!

Decline reason:

This time you're telling the truth - different from the other lies - right? Not convincing me. SQLQuery me! 02:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

SQL (And other admins), Ok! I admit it! The whole thing was a sham! Everything posted in 79.166.98.245 was a sham! It's all lies! No teen involved, I don't even know if a Sandra S. works at State Library of Ohio! The ip has changed long after what happened on that day! Me continuing to talk to this IP, was just an attempt to unblock that IP because of anyone that tries to go into my friend's wi-fi and can't edit! Sorry! I really am sorry! I pushed it too far! I should have known better, if I had a chance to go back to the past, I would prevent myself from doing this! Really, really sorry! I am a man of understanding so I understand if you want me to rot on the permablock status forever! I still promise to always but always follow the rules!

Decline reason:

In such a case you may want to take a look at the standard offer. Huon (talk) 11:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17439 was submitted on Feb 01, 2017 21:35:34. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18899 was submitted on Aug 04, 2017 01:27:18. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20587 was submitted on Feb 10, 2018 11:23:40. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 11:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sotirisdim4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

About 3-4 years ago, I decided that for whatever reason it would have been a fun idea to create unnecessary drama out of an IP adress I had at the time, by vandalizing articles and then creating a bogus story about a malicious situation (of which I think the specifics were that there was a troublemaker in a library we couldn't deal with, something ridiculous like that), and generally I pushed my situation to the limit, which lead to my block. I tried to make unblock requests, but I was too young at the time to assess the consequenses of my situation and became way too obsessed, leading in my requests getting denied, the creation of a sockpuppet that should have not existed in the first place, and generally not handling the consequences of what I did appropriately. That's basically the gist of why I have been blocked. Now, If I were to be unblocked, the articles I intend to edit are generally articles about topics that I am knowledgable about, which mainly focus around technology and video games, although I can also help to fix errors in articles such as spelling and grammatical errors, or update outdated information, and add materials to articles with missing information. Now, you may ask, why should I be unblocked and trusted after all the damage I did to the community in earlier years? I believe that I should be unblocked, because after some years have passed, I was able to properly reflect on what I have done, and am actually able to process the severity of the situation, and I am finally able to truly explain myself and move on, while making the best of efforts to improve wikipedia in a meaningful way, and not destroy any of its contents, as I have realized over the years how important sites like wikipedia are to the preservation of knowledge around the world, among more, basically it is an archive that should be respected. If I am granted the privilege of gaining back edit access to this site, I'll always make an effort to improve it, be it by correcting or adding new information to it. Generally I have matured a lot since the day I did the actions that led to my block, and I can confidently say I can assist in making wikipedia an even better place than what it is now. Finally, I'd like to close saying that I wholeheartedly apologise for all the time I've made the maintainers/admins of this site spend on cleaning up the drama and mess I created. I was bitter and immmature at the time, however over the years I've matured and came to see why and how actions my created a mess for the site. I just hope my form gets taken into consideration so I can contribute to this encyclopedia in a positive manner from now on. That's all. Sotirisdim4 (talk) 02:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive, or unwilling to provide an example edit they'd like to make. Yamla (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sotirisdim4&oldid=932733234"