User talk:Southindia

Welcome!

Hello, Southindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Malayali nadar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Linguisticgeek (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Malayali nadar[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Malayali nadar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Nadar (caste). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nadar (caste) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Linguisticgeek (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sivakasi riots of 1899[edit]

Hello Southindia. Be sure that all the new information you've just added to this article is backed up 100% by reliable sources. This article has been the subject of past conflict, and is being watched by admins. If you can't supply complete references in a short time, your edit may need to be reverted. I notice you have not yet joined the discussion on the article's talk page to explain your change, and I suggest you consider doing that. EdJohnston (talk) 18:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You did not reply to my comment, and since then you've made large changes to the article. You and Sodabottle have been going back and forth. I still hope you are planning to explain your changes. We do not want a new edit war to start. If there is no explanation, there is still a possibility of action by admins. EdJohnston (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, i am not going back and forth. I reverted his additions once, with a edit summary asking him to go the talk page. But when he reverted back, i backed off and waited for the watching admins to decide what to do with the edits. I dont want to be in an edit war :-). --Sodabottle (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Sivakasi riots of 1899[edit]

If you continue to revert this article with no explanation, and no comment on Talk, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. See WP:EW for our policy on edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 18:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You never comment on Talk. This is still a concern, and it may lead to admin action against you. If you are completely uninterested in what others think, the value of your future participation in Wikipedia is unclear. EdJohnston (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have resumed making edits to this article without providing a source, and you have not explained your changes on the talk page, as requested above. If this continues you may be blocked for WP:Edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I am not able to understand what you are trying to accomplish in Upper cloth revolt page. If you have a lot of interesting ideas, why dont you consider writing a book? --Car Tick 22:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please provide proofs to ur sentences mach.. or else people ll delte it! make sure of it.. cheersMayan302 (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]