User talk:SpaceFlight89/Archive

Welcome[edit]

Hello SpaceFlight89/Archive and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

ukexpat (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Gurwlsww[edit]

Re your message: I left them another warning about their last edits. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G1 Deletions[edit]

Just a heads that I've declined the speedy deletion nomination of Jotun Ibérica. Please note that G1 does not apply to material that is not in English. If you are not sure which tag to use when marking an article for deletion, please feel to drop me a line and I can help you out. TN X Man 15:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at WP:HD[edit]

Hi, SpaceFlight89. Although it's not a rule and is not compulsory, it would be best if you can provide an edit summary for edits like this. Since it's a removal of another editor's comment and a new contributor will find it hard to understand why you did it, it's best if you can explain you reasons for it briefly. Cheers. Chamal ^talk 06:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

...for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page --Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 13:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What ?[edit]

What is vandalism, can't you see that the section is biased and subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.128.2.120 (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!![edit]

Hey, Thanks for reverting vandalism at my user page. Happy editing!!!

Hitro talk 15:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page[edit]

Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of disruptive edits, which earn warnings and blocks.

Example[edit]

Whack!

The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of experienced Wikipedians.

To whack a user with a wet trout, simply place {{trout}} on their talk page.

--Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 20:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Stop beating me to it damn you :P, is HG any good? I'd like to use it but I'd need a different browser, there seems to a be a lack of gadgets for IE. - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 20:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cheers. - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 21:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Hersey[edit]

Many thanks for keeping such a vigilant eye over John Hersey. Much appreciated. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Robdogg02[edit]

If you simply blank an inappropriate page, it stays there in the edit history. If you tag it for speedy deletion (as vandalism, as an attack page, as a non-notable person)the creator gets a warning and shortly thereafter an administrator will likely delete it. In cases of vandalism or the posting of inappropriate content, a warning should always go on the offender's talk page. It ratchets them towards getting blocked. Merely blanking gives them a pass to continue the conduct. Thanks. Edison (talk) 17:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Elockid (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

86.150s and 81.150s[edit]

They're all Nangparbat (talk · contribs) YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 14:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts at the speed of light![edit]

Hi! You're reverting vandalism so fast, so I'm curious as to what tool you're using. Are you using Huggle? I'm also using Huggle, but my speed isn't nearly as fast as yours. Thanks. Netalarm 13:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your tip! Netalarm 13:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:207.254.160.203[edit]

Noticed this IP had a talk page with nothing on it. Realized they were reverting all the warnings that were being left on there so I went ahead and re-added them to the page and added one for the vandalism I reverted myself. DX927 (talk) 19:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UW-Vandalism templates[edit]

Hi SpaceFlight, I appreciate your combat against vandalism, but I would urge you to be a bit more wary when issuing "final warnings" to editors. This one, even though it came after an earlier warning, is too harsh--jumping from 1 to 4 is probably not the best assessment of the havoc wreaked by the IP (who only made two edits anyway). Also, I would urge you not to replace an older warning by another editor with a new one, since that makes it harder for editors and administrators to see quickly what damage was done and if and how the user has been warned (I had to go through the history to find User:Black-Velvet's earlier warning). Thanks, and keep up the good work, Drmies (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't know why huggle removed Black-Velvet's warning, may be an edit conflict—SpaceFlight89 16:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfC and IfU[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for your work in these areas. Can I just ask that you place the project banner {{WPAFC}} on everything you create, including the image talk pages (e.g. on File talk:Break of Reality at Baruch PAC 2009.jpg). If you've got any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Cheers, — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK…thanks for the tip.—SpaceFlight89 19:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of link - I need to understand what I'm doing wrong. Pls Help[edit]

Hi,

I added an external link to a page that you deleted. The relevant Wiki page was Depression.

The link was to a pdf on Depression in the site bio-identical-testosterone.com.

The link went directly to the pdf so the site was not displayed (there is a guidleline about links to commercial sites but this goes to the pdf not the site so the site is invissible to anyone clicking the link which I think is okay with the guidelines) and the content of the pdf is very relevant.

The site actually has a great number of other pdfs on a whole lot of medical conditions and I thought they would be useful to Wiki visitors under the various medical conditions they mention.

Can you please help me understand how these links are determined to be spam?

Thanks, Doreen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bridgey D (talk • contribs) 10:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Give me time[edit]

Please give me some time to improve this article. Thank You,--MTA International (talk) 11:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How to get image license?[edit]

Please tell me how to get the image license for lnserting logos and pictures in articles. What is the process of it --MTA International (talk) 05:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Young Republicans[edit]

Thanks for jumping in to help with this article; looks like we're dealing with one or more people on a Sprint PCS card with an clear axe to grind and just enough grasp of Wikipedia policies to project his or her own actions onto us. At what point does the article become a candidate for temporary semi-protection? Cheers, WWB (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One should also be mindful of WP:3RR in the case of the multi reverts done to Young Republicans. Lantrix ::Talk::Contrib:: 13:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also a good point. As SF89 points out on my Talk page, the anon user has now vowed to "check this (page) every waking hour to restore (revert) it if necessary." -- I've never gone through the page protection process and so do not know the details but, on the face of it, the YR article seems like a pretty good candidate. WWB (talk) 13:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So one of the IP editors returned; I took it to Help Desk and got some advice. I don't have time to deal with it this evening, but if you do, feel free. Cheers, WWB (talk) 23:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Cheers for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page. It is much appreciated. --Cpl Syx (talk) 11:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! ➲ REDVERS ^{Buy war bonds} 12:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opera (web browser)[edit]

Why did you undo my edit at Opera (web browser)? Please see WP:NAMB, which says not to add hatnotes to articles whose titles are already disambiguated. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

I was working on other articles and didn't see the addition again to unreliable resources to the article on Jordan Palmer (social activist) from the same user. Thank you for catching this and for your assistant. Kentucky1333 (talk) 05:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

For cleaning up at Taslima Nasrin. Drmies (talk) 06:13, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IFU[edit]

Thanks for working at WP:IFU. THe custom when putting up a picture is to add {{WPAFC}} to the image talk page to claim it for the afc project! It is used for statistics etc. If you load it to commons, add the talk page entry to the en.wikipedia talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing it on my image upload! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New editors[edit]

Hey there. Thanks for your vandal-fighting efforts. Regarding this editor - you might want to be a bit more "nice" in your first warning, such as a standard level 1 warning or welcome. These were their first-ever edits on the project, and sometimes a welcoming post with links to various policies and guidelines is helpful. I prefer WP:FRIENDLY myself, but your mileage may vary. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Tan | 39 16:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for not being mad. I didn't mean to delete that whole section. It was an accident and I was so glad that it wasn't permanent. Keep being gracious, it works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.174.89 (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright[edit]

You have marked an image i have uploaded as "speedy deletion". I have permission from the owner but am unclear how i can demonstrate this via the upload file page. Can you please give me some guidance and time??? --Jimmy (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Text and Image[edit]

I am working with them on the site as well. The text might sound similar...if so I can work on rewording it more. But I can have them send an email giving permission for the photo (and text) if necessary. --Jimmy (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also...the site is owned by Mr. Hargrove. Therefore I will have an email sent from him to the address which you have provided. --Jimmy (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have completely removed the page without even given me a chance to work on it!? Where is the copy I JUST rewrote? I put the "hang on" tag in the page so that you would at least give me 5 minutes to make my changes and get a letter of permission! Now I have to start over or can you get me the changes back that I just worked on? --Jimmy (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was later deleted as advertisement,[1] and that deletion is none of my doing. —SpaceFlight89 02:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the welcome, I appreciate the links you gave me! Tgv8925 (talk) 08:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Captain...[edit]

But what gives you the right to auto remove my second edit on a TALK page when comment was clearly not the most "vandalizing." --74.5.78.97

If you don't think the person is notable, nominate the article for deletion. Wikipedia:Deletion policy. The talk page is not for insulting him. —SpaceFlight89 06:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for taking care of the vandal who was posting obscenities on the San Diego page. --MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

And I'd like to say thanks for your help with pictures. I had no idea how much work went into each and every one. Loleil (talk) 01:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU[edit]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I semi-protected my user page so you don’t have to worry about. I appreciate the hard work you doing. See ya--David - (Wikipedia Vandal Fighter). 01:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Wolhuter User talk:WildCasterWolhuter[edit]

Please use the PROPER warning templates when reverting the removal of speedy delete templates. A generic vandalism template is not appropriate in this situation, and can be confusing and bitey to new users, as in this situation. WuhWuzDat 13:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for reverting that name calling edit on my talk Page. Actually, i didn't even see it and had to check my history. It is time that something was done about that unregistered user especially since he enjoys making threats. --Cyber Fox (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

accidental block[edit]

Sorry, I accidentally blocked you. Though acting immediately to undo it, I'm still not sure it's unwound completely. Can you confirm you're able to edit? —EncMstr (talk) 16:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can edit only this page —SpaceFlight89 17:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I found the autoblock and cleared it. You should be able to edit now. Sorry again. —EncMstr (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I hadn't realized I was blocked until you posted here, so it was no problem. :)—SpaceFlight89 17:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. I must have clicked off-by-one in a harried three vandal blocking sweep. Imagine my surprise when I saw a supposed vandal's talk page full of constructive comments! I'm so used to seeing long lists of warnings and nonsense that I was stunned and confused for a full minute. Glad there was little impact on your part. Thanks for all your great work. —EncMstr (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle[edit]

I'm using Twinkle to tackle vandalism, but it seems that four times out of five a Huggle user has got there first. This leads me to believe that Huggle is faster than Twinkle. I've gone to the Huggle page to download it, but all of the links are red. When I click on them it says that the pages have been deleted! Have you any idea how I might get Huggle? ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 09:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see: I need roleback. Thanks! ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 09:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IFU[edit]

Hello, when you upload a picture for WP:IFU can I encourage you to please mark the talk page with {{WPAFC}} and put an image= tag on the ifu template to say what you called the file? This associates the work with the AFC project and makes it so that the requester can see where their picture went. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it is looking better already! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rajasekhara Reddy[edit]

Alright. Let's await the confirmation of the news. Thanks. --Altruism^{T a l k - Contribs.} 05:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Code Lyoko[edit]

Your comment regarding my statement "Code Lyoko may be over, but it will live on forever in our hearts. it has meant so much to so many people but has been so under-regocnized. long live code lyoko and the legacy it has left. It will forever be a part of me and all the fans. It has so much potential but hasnt lived up to it. it could've been so much more. But, as I said, It will live on forever in our hearts and dreams. RETURN TO THE PAST, NOW! " on the code lyoko page has been reverted. ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT A FAN? DID IT OR DID IT NOT CHANGE YOUR LIFE!?!? DID IT EVEN MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.249.129.134 (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Brosnan_us[edit]

Please see the above link where you have been named as a party to a request for arbitration. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 12:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get it nor do I see anthing about me or Brosnan_us on that page. What am I supposed to do? —SpaceFlight89 15:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[2] — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon[edit]

Hello, You requested this file to be deleted. I disagree. Please see my views here and let me know your thoughts there or here

Best,
Invest in knowledge (talk) 11:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information needed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Opinion786[edit]

Hello. Thank you for filing Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Opinion786. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a code letter, which indicates to checkusers why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely, SPCUClerkbot (talk) 03:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PODS logo.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PODS logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 86.139.142.44 (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well done[edit]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		Thanks for all your hard work with WP:WPAFC! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:)—SpaceFlight89

image[edit]

added to comments forgot to say i scanned it.

SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk)(Contribs) 18:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

p.s sorry for inconvenience.

thanks[edit]

thank for help only just started uploading photos so also thanks for chnging the licencing.

SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk)(Contribs) 18:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reversion[edit]

Hello there! Thanks for helping patrol the recent changes page, keep up the great work! GlassCobra 16:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

revision without explanation of Sermon on the Mount[edit]

Please see the talk page for details. 75.15.204.198 (talk) 19:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just add the {{unreferenced}} tag if you want, but don't change the section header as you did last time. —SpaceFlight89 19:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please defend your actions on the article talk page. Thank you. 75.15.204.198 (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...[edit]

...for reverting that troll. I was hoping maybe the youtube would take me to something interesting, like maybe an uncensored clip of Serena Williams' tirade, but no such luck. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 23:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curious[edit]

I am curious ... why the self-revert on the AIV report? — Kralizec! (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted one of their edits and huggle reported the IP to AIV automatically; I wasn't 100% sure that the IP was vandalizing though, so I reverted the vandalism report. The edits looked more like unsourced additions to me [3][4]. —SpaceFlight89 15:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work![edit]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your never ending commitment to stamping out vandalism. ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 18:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —SpaceFlight89 18:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your userpage[edit]

I never knew that. But thanks for reminding me. Ricky3374 (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Just wanted to say excellent work with your vandal-fighting. My block button is getting worn out.... :-) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) —SpaceFlight89 16:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kick a Ginger[edit]

Sad to say it is not quite untrue, see Ginger_Kids#Controversy, however it does not warrant being listed. --Drappel (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks. —SpaceFlight89 21:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

Thanks for the reversion G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 18:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and again, thanks! G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 08:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guinea protest[edit]

On 29 September 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Guinea protest, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Headline text[edit]

Dear SpaceFlight89,

It is kind of you to have reverted the vandalism committed in the body of the article on Jatindranath Mukherjee.

Warm regards.--BobClive (talk) 08:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your work fighting vandalism on Confirmation bias. Much appreciated! MartinPoulter (talk) 14:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism ?[edit]

But its wrong yes i have changed it but there was an orange 3 muskateers with nutty chocolate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.52.46 (talk) 16:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tazer[edit]

This guy is a sock puppet of a guy wha has been blocked many times just look his history and sock tag he has been taking off his page, one of his sock was blocked yesterday, he is strictly anti-Indian can u help me with it, all the administrators i know r offline right now.Qazmlp1029 (talk) 14:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know about him. YellowMonkey told me when I reverted vandalism by one of Nangparbat's socks. I guess we can't do anything but wait until he's blocked, then revert all his edits.. —SpaceFlight89 14:59, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unconstructive edits[edit]

Sorry about the unconstructive edits on the North Holmwood page. Haven't done that before, won't do it again. Ignorant editors got the better of me I'm afraid. Keep up the good work, sorry to have needed your services —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.186.163 (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

eureka seven —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.19.92.178 (talk) 01:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not able to put advice. Please correct erroneous pages as I adviced. By! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.7.142.25 (talk) 10:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

west bank, minneapolis[edit]

have you ever been to west bank, minneapolis? I understand that the only person who would actually make a wikipedia entry about something generally is infatuated with it and is going to try to flatter themselves by association. However, since I've stumbled across this wikipedia entry I'd like it to be a little more balanced. Right now it looks no different than if the republican party wrote an article to describe it's own policies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirxle (talk • contribs) 17:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. —SpaceFlight89 17:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

I believe tou just deleted my comment because it was nonconstructive, but that was the point. I want someone's attention because some guy just deleted the intro and wrote one stupid phrase on the Nature versus Nurture entry, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.113.38 (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guinea protest[edit]

Hello SpaceFligth89 Thank you for creating the Article 2009 Guinea protest ! Very good idea – and very important ! I have cite the article in my last blog posting – [5] its in French, but perhaps you can read French ? yours Christophe Neff (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Don't know French, but I read the post using a translator. :) —SpaceFlight89 20:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jessy J Guitars & Saxes photo[edit]

I didn't know exactly how to reply to the photo. It's not my photo and I can't change the copyright. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newboy27one (talk • contribs) 15:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jessy J on Guitars & Saxes Tour[edit]

I had tried to get a photo on the Jessy J article but it was declined. I contacted the person who took the photo and he said that I could use it, just give him credit. Is there some way I can use it having his permission, or how could I prove that he said I could use it?--Newboy27one (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jessy J on Guitars & Saxes Tour[edit]

I had tried to get a photo on the Jessy J article but it was declined. I contacted the person who took the photo and he said that I could use it, just give him credit. Is there some way I can use it having his permission, or how could I prove that he said I could use it?--Newboy27one (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of the photo, whom I told you gave me permission to use the phot, changed the copyright info. It should be available for use now. I hope. Thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newboy27one (talk • contribs) 03:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me[edit]

I did not vandalise the Pam Ann wiki. I added info that has been made public by both parties and if you would like a reference, I would be more than happy to provide them. Adding a famous friend of Pam Ann is NOT vandalising and I email the admin of Wikipedia to state this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.176.45 (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shoplifting accusation[6] needs to be sourced; you or someone using your IP also changed the birth year of Sinitta to 1496[7]. —SpaceFlight89 15:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is TWO sources for you. http://clubdiscodm.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/dannii-bailed-me-out/ and http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/latest/2008/11/27/celeb-airhostess-pam-anne-on-x-factor-s-dannii-minogue-cheryl-cole-and-madonna-video-115875-20929268/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.176.45 (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what the heck![edit]

he obviously is on steroids look how big he is! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.168.252 (talk) 17:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is obvious; see WP:NOR & WP:BLP. —SpaceFlight89 17:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Images for upload - ArnoCorps 2008 Promo Shot.jpg[edit]

Re: Images for upload - ArnoCorps 2008 Promo Shot.jpg, we have updated the license on Flickr to CC-BY-SA as requested. Thank you for your assistance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.8.67.86 (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cite[edit]

Hi, thank you for your welcome. I have uploaded an article but it is asking for inline citations, what id that and how do you insert them? Thanks again. Jimmydenham Jimmydenham (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well?[edit]

I explained to you why I had not vandalised a page and you deleted it all from your discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.176.45 (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its in the archive, and I still find your edits increasingly suspicious. Stop changing dates maliciously[8]. I see you've been warned about this before too.[9]. —SpaceFlight89 18:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Northwest tree octopus[edit]

Does there need to be a templated infobox available for "It's a hoax, we know it's a hoax, don't add 'WTF Dudez, this so like isn't true!!'"?

Some of these muppets are vandals, some of them just don't seem capable of reading the first line. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol yeah, maybe frustrating for someone with that page on their watchlist. —SpaceFlight89 19:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism. I think it may be a sockpuppet. What should I do?--Jastcaan (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Report to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism if they do that again..—SpaceFlight89 15:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to get a life. Who sits around all day editing wikipedia articles for fun? Go play World of Warcraft or something, you douche. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.139.169.210 (talk) 17:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess. —SpaceFlight89 17:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added legitimate information about rap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.139.169.210 (talk) 17:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is your problem?[edit]

i have submitted correct information on various subjects on this website, and you continue to delete them, calling it vandalism. Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blobminijames (talk • contribs) 16:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]