User talk:SpaghettiSauce9

For those whom it may concern.

TVXQ: I did not intentionally engage in edit warring to cause hurt to other 'fans', and if it did I apologize. But it is obvious that there are 'fans' who can't accept reality or the situation today. These people insist on placing an inaccurate list of members in this article. When my edits were repeatedly undone I lost my temper and decided to see how far this would go. Now that attention has been brought to this issue maybe it will be settled once and for all.

Every fact shows that the TVXQ of the present is made of two members now. The most accurate description of TVXQ now would include those three former members to be put under 'Past Members', and this is what I had been doing before last memorable Sunday. Regarding the image, I did not remove it initially, but after another user did during that period, I decided to go along.

On the image itself. It is outdated by four years. Which is a long time by the standards of the entertainment industry. There should be a more up-to-date version placed in the article and if it were to be accurate like all other articles should be, any picture taken in 2011 would have two members only. 'Fans' are so obsessed however that they refuse to let this go and any picture uploaded with two members is taken down. This is partly due to there not being one uploaded yet that meets Wiki's copyright usage standards but the point stands. If one can be found and uploaded, these 'fans' are going to do the same as what happened with the members list and keep changing it. Thus the dilemma. SpaghettiSauce9 (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on TVXQ. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

EarthCross (talk · contribs) account

Can you please explain what your relation is to the EarthCross (talk · contribs) account? Wikipedia does not allow people to edit using multiple accounts. You may only edit with a single account. If you are editing under both accounts, please stop now or you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I made the ID from my laptop and forgot to sign out to use this one. To be honest I expected to be blocked by now. Thanks for warning me. I won't use it anymore. SpaghettiSauce9 (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining the issue. I have blocked the EarthCross account per policy, but will not block this account. You may have alternate accounts for use on insecure wireless connections like you might find editing from a laptop, but they must be clearly identified as alternate accounts per policy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)