User talk:Spencererer

Some friendly advice

Greetings,

You seem to have created article Apostate Prophet. Though many new atheist Ex Muslims very active on social media are notable in the sense they are well known. But Wikipedia is platform too politicized where technicalities are manipulated at the cost undermining merit, and unfortunately we can not do much about it. It would be pragmatic that you save a copy of the article in user sand box because more likely than not it may get contested and many articles on Wikipedia are deleted on some or other pretext. At some point of time more reliable sources as Wikipedia's civil push community expects would become available and then you can bring back deleted articles in main space.

Do not get involved in edit wars and too much debate where civil push users might find excuses to get you blocked from editing. Just be around but don't do to much haste which might give chance for others to get you blocked.

Thanks and regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Apostate Prophet

The article Apostate Prophet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP lacks independent coverage to meet WP:ANYBIO (this nomination has nothing to do with politics, by the way).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)