User talk:Sq2id

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Sq2id! I noticed your contributions to Ed Gein and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Thriftycat TalkContribs 16:23, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Cjse23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mukhannath—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cjse23 (talk) 13:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sq2id (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I am writing to request for the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, Sq2id. I understand that my account has been blocked due to a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for any inconvenience or disruption caused.   I have been a dedicated editor on Wikipedia for the past three years and have contributed significantly to various articles and discussions. Wikipedia has been an invaluable source of knowledge for me, and I have always strived to uphold the website's principles of neutrality, verifiability, and reliability. However, I understand that there may have been instances where my actions may have been perceived as a violation of these principles, and I take full responsibility for them.   I would like to assure you that I have taken the time to thoroughly review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I am committed to adhering to them in all my future contributions. I have also consulted with other experienced editors and sought their feedback to improve my editing skills and avoid any potential violations.   I am deeply passionate about Wikipedia and its mission to provide free and accurate information to the world. I have invested a significant amount of time and effort in building my account and contributing to the community. Being blocked has been a humbling experience, and I have learned valuable lessons from it. I am eager to continue my contributions and be a part of the Wikipedia community once again.   I understand that the decision to block an account is not taken lightly, and I respect the Wikipedia team's dedication to maintaining the integrity of the website. However, I would like to request a second chance to prove myself as a responsible and valuable member of the community.   In addition to my commitment to following Wikipedia's policies, I would also like to highlight some of my past contributions to the website. I have created and expanded several articles, particularly in the areas of science and technology, which have been well-received by the community. I have also actively participated in discussions and helped resolve disputes in a calm and respectful manner.   Furthermore, I have always been open to constructive criticism and have made necessary changes to my edits based on feedback from other editors. I believe this shows my dedication to improving the quality of content on Wikipedia and working collaboratively with other editors.   I understand that the decision to unblock my account lies in the hands of the Wikipedia team, but I sincerely hope that you will consider my request. I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's policies and being a valuable member of the community. I am also willing to go through any necessary training or additional measures to ensure that I am contributing in accordance with the website's guidelines.   Thank you for taking the time to read my email and considering my request. I am looking forward to a positive response and the opportunity to continue my contributions on Wikipedia.   Sincerely,   Sq2id

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not considered. Also, checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sq2id (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Subject:Subject: Request to unharness account Sq2id on Wikipedia Dear Wikipedia administrators, . I am penning this e mail to request that my account Sq2id be unlocked on Wikipedia. I am a subscriber on the grounds that final month and actively contributing to the forum. However, my account has been blocked due to multiple accounts. I understand that Wikipedia has a strict coverage in opposition to a couple of accounts, but I need to provide an explanation for the occasions that prompted me to create a new account. When I first signed up for Wikipedia I changed into blind to this policy and had created a 2d account to cope with a exceptional topic I changed into inquisitive about. I had no bad intentions and changed into just seeking to help the community in an prepared manner. However, I quickly realized my mistake and decided to paste to the use of best one account, that is Sq2id. I’ve only been running on this account for the beyond month and haven’t used my new account in any respect. I assure you that I haven't any purpose of creating more articles inside the future, and will adhere to all Wikipedia rules any longer. I am very unhappy approximately my paintings and understand the importance of following Wikipedia recommendations. I’ve been an avid person of Wikipedia for a long term and it’s constantly been my go-to supply for dependable statistics. I turned into also inspired with the willpower and tough paintings of the volunteers and the editors in walking the occasion. I hate the error of jeopardizing my capacity to contribute to the sort of super network. I am willing to offer any extra information or explanation needed to solve this trouble. I am also open to any correction that the staff deems necessary. I sincerely make an apology for any inconvenience

Decline reason:

I'm afraid you lack sufficient competence (WP:CIR) to write coherent English without the use of an AI chatbot and we are uninterested in AI chatbot contributions here. Please stick to your own native language version of Wikipedia.  Confirmed sockpuppetry well in excess of two accounts (though true, no edits with other accounts in more than a month). Yamla (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sq2id (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hello, wiki team. please forgive me for spelling as English is not not my first language. I know what I did was wrong but I just wanted another account to commit to editing another article but I forgot the password so I make this account which I make my great edits on. I know about the sock puppetry rules and I read the articles made on that here. Also for the AI written unblock requests, I am a busy person so I asked AI to write them but THIS on isn't AI Made at all. Thirdly, the hyperlinking. I was unaware of the rules about hyperlinking. I know that what rules I broke are excusable and yeah I know I am a checkuser confrimed sockpuppet account but please. I have great plans for Wikipedia and you won't regret unblocking me. Love, Sq2id

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Note from blocking admin You state in your appeal above "I know what I did was wrong", and yet you just sent me an email 5 minutes ago that asks why I blocked you. This appeal should be declined; the standard offer is available to pursue.-- Ponyobons mots 17:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And now you email me to say you took a nap, woke up and forgot you were blocked, so you emailed me to ask why you were blocked? Complete nonsense. I've revoked your talk page access and ability to send emails.-- Ponyobons mots 20:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Restoring old unblock requests that were again removed. Please keep these requests on your talk page. Thriftycat TalkContribs 17:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Replying to email here to keep my address private) I'm not an administrator, so I won't comment on your unblock request. Thriftycat TalkContribs 14:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry for bothering you Sq2id (talk) 17:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wait if your not a admin then what are you? Sq2id (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a regular editor. Thriftycat TalkContribs 18:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

block questions lol[edit]

what does a accepted unblock request look like Sq2id (talk) 17:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok thanks!!! Sq2id (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

more block questions lmao[edit]

i can edit my talk page and user page but it says I'm still blocked? wtf Sq2id (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]