User talk:Squee3

Graphics Lab[edit]

Hello, Squee3. A reply to your request at the Illustration workshop has been made.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Illustration reply}} template.

Roshan (talk)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your edit in {{Infobox technetium}} was disruptive and even introduced errors. You have been informed before. Please take note of common edit habits. -DePiep (talk) 21:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today you made three nosensical and disruptive edits [1][2][3]. You are invited to edit contructively, or else wikipedia community might feel the need to block you. -DePiep (talk) 18:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chemical symbol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re USA map[edit]

First of all, great catch on the border there, I'll fix that asap. As for the other, I'll see what I can do but no promises, as I didn't make the line map. What is the purpose of doing it, since they will be pretty small on that map? --Golbez (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

re map updates[edit]

Wow, so great to see someone noticing my workd. :) And in fact, you're the first person I can recall who cared about the map images and not just the change images. I am updating everything, I'm kind of uploading as I go, the maps will be updated as well. Any issues that pop up should be resolved soon. This third version of the maps is being done in QGIS, so it's all using shapefiles and vectors, much better than my old traced work. Civilian GIS tools have advanced enough since I started this project nearly 20 years ago that it's much easier to use now.

As for the other maps, I'm still figuring out how to handle them. I am definitely going to redo the NW and Caribbean maps; not sure about Pacific yet, as that's already pretty well done and doesn't benefit nearly as much from the new setup, but I probably will since I'm also working on maritime border updates now. --Golbez (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can do what you want, but I would like to have a series of maps that shows everything to the same scale. Squee3 (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So to be honest, when you said "to the same scale and same aspect ratio," my mind only saw, "same image size". So I made sure they were the same dimensions! Because then it's easier to make GIF frames, which is my next project! Which is different than scale, of course. Whoops.

That said, before going back through and trying that out I suppose I should ask why? What is the benefit you're anticipating from this? --Golbez (talk) 02:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And since I used the same scale for NW NA as I did for Central NA, and probably will do for the Caribbean, then it is indeed just the Pacific scale that stands out. However, any attempt at matching scale would require either: 1) Truncating the map to just Hawaii; 2) Including everything in its own insets, but considering some of them are many times larger than Hawaii [like the TTPI] and already can consume a huge part of the map area, that doesn't seem like the best idea; or 3) creating an image roughly 4x larger in each dimension, making it somewhat useless. I don't like any of these options. --Golbez (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]