User talk:Squirrellly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Squirrellly, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Squirrellly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital platform (March 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Robert McClenon! I understand your reply and request further guidance from you. Digital platforms are a notable phenomenon and deserve their own article (for instance, the New York Times has published 55 articles about "digital platform" this past year alone). Writing an article is currently prevented by the fact that "digital platform" is now a disambiguation article (with zero incoming link from other Wikipedia articles!), redirecting to "web portal" and "computing platform" (which is disputable but that is not the point). Please note, though, that only 8 New York Times articles mention "computing platform" and 15 "web portal" this past year, these two being far less notable at this point. So the question is: What is the best path forward to address this surprising shortcoming? (that does not exist in, say, Spanish Wikipedia: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plataforma_digital). Two options:
1) Rename the existing Digital Platform article "Digital Platform (Disambiguation)" so I can create the missing article (and link it as a third redirect in the disambiguation page)
2) Remove the disambiguation tag from the existing Digital Platform article, so we can edit content there. I'd leave a mention of the two existing redirects before the lead, and add content right after. This would be my preferred option, but I am not familiar with the process for removing a disambiguation tag. This needs to be authorized somehow but not sure by whom.
I really feel that we are stuck right now because of a disambiguation tag that is not particularly useful for anyone (no internal article links pointing at it) yet prevents improving Wikipedia around a notable topic. Thanks in advance for your help. Squirrellly (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Squirrellly - My advice at this point is to resubmit the draft. I have copied your comments from this page, which is your user talk page, to the draft talk page, where they may be read by another editor if another editor reads the draft. If you resubmit, with a statement, I will review the draft in more detail, but am not promising you when I will review it. I will then either leave it for another reviewer or follow approach 1. There isn't always a fixed approach for some things like removing a disambiguation tag. There is a procedure for removing an article, which is a different matter. A lot of decisions in Wikipedia are made by some experienced editor deciding to be bold; then, if there is objection, one of the standard consensus-based procedures such as Articles for Deletion or Request for Comment is used. So go ahead and resubmit it. I won't decline it again. I might accept it, or I might leave it for other reviewers. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital platform (July 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue at 01:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]