User talk:Sridharbabu1983

Welcome!

Hello, Sridharbabu1983, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Mohamed ElGedawy ^Talk 16:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dahir (Raja), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dahir (Raja) was changed by Sridharbabu1983 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852952 on 2011-10-13T13:04:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of digraphs in Latin alphabets with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 13:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of digraphs in Latin alphabets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of digraphs in Latin alphabets was changed by Sridharbabu1983 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924763 on 2011-10-13T13:19:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Who, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Who was changed by Sridharbabu1983 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92678 on 2011-10-13T13:21:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dahir (Raja). Wikipelli ^Talk 13:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 13:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sridharbabu1983 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for blocking. I want to be blocked because I become a addict of wikipedia. I waste a lot of time before computer to waste days and days months and months. I open so many accounts sridhar100, sridhar1000, sridhar00,sridhar10, sridhar10000, sridhar100000, fatbuu58, fatbuu1000, sridharbabu58, sridharbabu1000, sridharbabu1983. Please delete all of these accounts. My request is completely block this IP.

Decline reason:

Please do not use the unblock request template for purposes other than unblock requests. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Sridharbabu1983 (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]