User talk:Srinu523

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of 12 September 2015.

Archives

Sep 2013 – Mar 2015
Apr 2015
May 2015
Jun 2015
Jul 2015
Aug 2015

Hello, Srinu523, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srinu523, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—☮JAaron95 ^Talk 10:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Db[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Db requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no reason given

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Srinu ^{(Talk | contrib)} 13:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi Srinu, feeling bad for your retirement, specially because a very minor routine content dispute ultimately led to your retirement. I think you are good editor and your passion for Cricket is doubtless. It will be better if you come back after a Wikibreak. You were involved in Sock puppetry and you got your punishment and matter is closed. You don't have to feel guilty for it forever, everyone does some kind of mistakes, no one is perfect. I hope best for you in your real life. I still hope that you will come back to contribute to Cricket related topics till 2016 T20 World Cup or next IPL. Regards. --Human3015^TALK 18:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Human3015[edit]

User:Human3015 Am not a dispute/disruptive/Sock Puppet or not deserve editor on wiki. When I found a wrong statement, I just try to correct that as per the wiki/some other old articles/rules seen at wiki but only one Person could not expected that, and stamped the above names to me. Wiki could not gave me any thing with out that awards. How can they decided some one would sock for me with out heard my words, Its very silly and funny. I don't know why they are said that. In their talk they said my edits were similarly to another editor(sock), all the involved parties edits also just like me then am I any sock to any one and I had copied the profile/sign/ some things form others. I had already decided to leave wiki when that one stamped/awarded me dispute/disruptive/deserve editor, but wanna wait till the RM at KL Rahul.

I just try to remove my total login, may be that will be soon. Thanking You for your response. Srinu ^{(Talk | contrib)} 16:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, if you think that you were innocent then why you didn't comment on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srinu523 and proved your innocence? But that matter is over now, it was actually good thing that even after CU said that "2 accounts are Technically indistinguishable" still you got blocked just for 1 week, I thought you will get blocked indefinitely. So actually you are lucky. I can't really force you to stay or retire, it is all your decision but I generally think that Wikipedia is really nice place to stay. --Human3015^TALK 17:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not active at that time to talk back. When I came to on line I blocked. No problem what ever that happened. Srinu ^{(Talk | contrib)} 17:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Srinu523, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

117.232.129.91 (talk) 10:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SRH current squad 2014.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SRH current squad 2014.jpg, which you've attributed to Facebook. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SunRisers Hyderabad Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SunRisers Hyderabad Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SunRisers Hyderabad Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SunRisers Hyderabad Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 09:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2015 Caribbean Premier League group stage[edit]

Template:2015 Caribbean Premier League group stage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Caribbean Premier League results summary[edit]

Template:Caribbean Premier League results summary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]