User talk:Srpnor

Welcome!

Hello, Srpnor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Special-T 13:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srpnor! I hope you're enjoying Wikipedia. I noticed you reverted some vandalism and warned the user - excellent work. However, I must remind you to sign your posts with four tildes, like this - ~~~~. This is important for a variety of reasons, but in this case I needed it to look at the datestamp. The vandal you warned did his thing on another page as well, and when I went to warn him, I saw the warnings you placed, but had to go to the page history to see when they were added. Bit of a waste of time, really :) So, in future, just type four tildes for your name and the timestamp, 3 tildes for just your name, or 5 tildes for just the timestamp. Alternatively (if you're lazy, like me) you can just hit the button on top of the edit box that looks like cursive writing, in between the crossed out W and the horizontal line.

Take care, and I hope you're enjoying yourself around these parts :) riana_dzasta 16:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the note - I've been trying to get into the habit of signing, but do slip up occasionally! Srpnor 16:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it - you'll find yourself doing it at the end of e-mails, sooner or later... riana_dzasta 16:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:rm personal attacks[edit]

Belated reply: Yeah, it's good not to get bent out of shape over a few personal attacks. But I still believe in removing them. :-) Heimstern Läufer 00:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken PROD?[edit]

Hi. :) Can you tell me what was broken about the PROD on Blackblood alliance? I'm not very technical myself, but if Twinkle is breaking PRODS, User:AzaToth probably needs to know about it. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. I'll just assume Twinkle is functioning fine, then, and keep an eye out for future problems. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Dwarf peer review[edit]

Hi there. The Red Dwarf article has just been requested for a Peer Review. As a member of WikiProject Red Dwarf I was wondering if you would like to join in on the discussions. The article has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. If you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Red Dwarf --Nreive (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Participating in AfD Discussions[edit]

Hey just a note on your participation in AfD discussions: if you do not believe an article should be deleted, such as here, it is much easier on the closing admin if you say Keep instead of Not Delete. Cheers and keep up the good work! Redfarmer (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Srpnor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]