User talk:Ssadler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your creation of Stephen Sadler[edit]

Please do not post your own resume on Wikipedia. It is considered a conflict of interest and will be speedily deleted. Wikipedia is not a free webspace provider. There are many free web hosting services you can use instead. Please contribute constructively to Wikipedia in the future. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. John254 23:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to post resume. I am trying to allow the reader to understand where SCATE came from. Is there better method? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssadler (talkcontribs) 23:47, 25 November 2006

Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view that "represent[s] views fairly, proportionately and without bias". Much of the content that you have contributed appears to be inconsistent with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, because it is written in the style of advertising matter. Consider sentences such as the following from Scate:

SCATE employs a team of talented programmers, engineers, instructional systems designers, and support staff that committed to the mission.

and

SCATE is a registered service mark of SCATE® Technologies, Inc. Ignite and the Ignite logo are trademarks of SCATE® Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

This material is clearly not written from a neutral point of view. John254 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]