User talk:St Malo

Welcome!

Hi St Malo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! VIGNERON * ^discut. 10:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:St Malo reported by User:VIGNERON (Result: ). Thank you. —VIGNERON * ^discut. 16:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Robert Surcouf

Hello St Malo. You've been warned for edit warring at Robert Surcouf per a complaint at the noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again before getting a consensus in your favor on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello again. Can you please do something about your signature? It shows your name but not the date and time. More information is at WP:SIGN. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I forgot how it. But I see that Wikipedia, continues to be confronted with the demons of manipulation. So this I will not search a consensus because we want to say absolutely of a man who made 2 slave trade trips out of 120 commercial trips, that he was a slave trader ...

=> Erase this vital information (2 trips on 120) by describing it as useless (it allows to judge the relevance of the title of slave trader or not), is revealing

=> To divert the remarks of the specialist of surcouf in making him say that surcouf is a slave trader whereas he said quite the opposite. He wrote on Wikipedia France and I reproduced his answer on the discussion page

However, I am thinking of the future. This way of lying about reality, will be very useful later to restore the truth that showing that is militancy and not the encyclopedic spirit that guided this

Tonight - in view of this way of acting, I wonder about the real importance of the Western slave trade and I will certainly not be the only one. Sorry for your inconvenience.St Malo (talk)