User talk:Stadler981

Your edit at fetal pain

Hi. We've never communicated before. However, I just thought you should know that your little edit at the fetal pain article, saying that RCOG is "pro-choice", has resulted in quite a big controversy. See here.Ferrylodge 12:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Bandit (TV series)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bandit (TV series), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Bandit. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material. In plain English, you copied it, you modify it to the standards of 4 (count em, 4,) high brow "editors". Anyone of which could erase the article as he chose[[Help:edit summary|edit summary]}

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Bandit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  01:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to the page Bandit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 01:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bandit. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  01:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bandit. Willking1979 (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I responded here.  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  02:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Dont Dispair

When high-brow editors such as "christos doulos" whack your articles or threaten to "ban" you. There are many forms of creative vandalism you can use to set them straight. Many of these freaks are psycho-neurotic wanna-be authors whose only prior experience at editing is to write on shit-house walls. I have been given many "last warnings' and my ass has never flown off. Most of these eggheads spend to much time with their heads in textbooks. regardsKaltenborn (talk)

I am sure they are meaning well and overall do a good job. I am not sure 'creative vandalism' is a good approach....--Stadler981 (talk) 17:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Sex Kills for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Sex Kills, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunting (House) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

HPME listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HPME. Since you had some involvement with the HPME redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)