User talk:Starkenborgher

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Bargur taluk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bargur taluk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Vellar request

Hi, I need your feedback on your request here. It is not possible for you to upload another pesons work and the drafts you have seen are just drafts so please leave feedback on your request, thnaks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TrangaBellam -- TrangaBellam (talk) 11:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu)

The article Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TrangaBellam -- TrangaBellam (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allapalli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aheri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Fort Ross, Nunavut

Please don't change coordinates when they are sourced as at Fort Ross. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Hi! I think my change was fair, but I totally understand your undoing of the edit. When I started editing the article, I think I used source 4 in the current revision (website), to source the post's elevation, and as a rationale for leaving in the coordinates which were already there when I started editing (the geospatial data extraction tool is pretty much the CGNDB but you can't get the outlines, instead being able to hover the cursor over places to get exact coordinates, which I don't consider original research, I think). I understand the source wasn't right next to the coordinates when you edited the article to tidy it up (thank you, by the way), and understand why you then added the CGNDB as a source for the coordinates it just straight up gives you. But it's just not accurate because Fort Ross is not where the CGNDB says it is, because if we're to believe it then Fort Ross would be underwater. The website even says "In some instances the feature boundary may not align with the base map due to the scale and datum at which the feature was collected," so it knows the boundary/outline element isn't 100% accurate. So that's why I changed it from the coordinates you put, and readded the seconds measure to have the coordinates be roughly in between the two buildings. I hope this makes sense and is acceptable. I'm going to make another edit on the page to reflect what I've said here, but we can keep discussing. <3 Starkenborgher (talk) 02:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

No problem. Probably best to change the source in the {{coord}} to reflect that. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goggles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polar Bear.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)