User talk:Stephanie.gordon

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alexis Glick, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Moocha (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Alexis Glick

The goal of an encyclopedia article is to convey factual information. Personal quotes by the subject of the article are almost never appropriate since they do not add any information value to the article. Please do not continue adding the quotes. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Alexis Glick. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 00:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Alexis Glick. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... discospinster _talk 00:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Alexis Glick. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. ... discospinster _talk 00:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

I informed you several times as to why your post was deleted. You made negative claims about her financial situation without any reliable sources to back it up. This type of thing is not allowed on Wikipedia; see WP:BLP. ... discospinster _talk 00:58, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

So you would add that her house is for sale? And this is important why? ... discospinster _talk 01:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

User has been warned several times that this information is unsupported and irrelevant even were it true, and continues to ignore moderators and repost it. User has a long track record of this and other acts of vandalism, including other sites. User:Howhandyisthatcom 16:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Note: following was originally posted on user page, now moved here

The link you have posted as support for your claim does not support it, and is further unencyclopedic (meaning it is inappropriate under Wikipedia's content guidelines). What you are doing violates Wikipedia rules,and this is not the only site you have vandalized. They have all been removed. You have a long track record of vandalizing this page, and if you continue to do so, you may lose editing privileges and have your IP address banned. Your activities are being monitored, and you will be held accountable for your decisions. This is a good time for you to stop.

User vandalized Alexis Glick article repeatedly leading up to 8/1

8/1 - Posted multiple identical copies of false and defamatory material. After volunteer cleanup, returned to repost unsupported and unencyclopedic material.

8/2 Continues vandalism.

8/3 continued vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howhandyisthatcom (talk • contribs)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alexis Glick, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Just to state the obvious: a. there is no reliable source verifying that this is her house, b. even if there were, there is no possible reason to include it--we're writing an encyclopedia, not a newspaper or collection of trivia, c. this is a possible violation of our policy for biographies of living persons. You have been asked over and over again to not add this information, yet you persist: please consider this your final warning. Next time, you will be blocked. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

That is fine. This is definitely her house, but obviously she is going to great lengths to hide the fact that they are struggling. There are tons of comments, blog entries, etc online that verify that this is her house. (A) Here is a link to a hamptons magazine article that she did about her home. she is in the pictures and cleary it is her home. http://hamptons.curbed.com/archives/2009/07/14/afternoon_delight_water_mills_white_house.php (B) this should be included in post fox - she sold it POST FOX (C) her home is widely accessible on the internet. anyone can find it quite easily Stephanie.gordon (talk) 20:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

• I wonder if you know what Wikipedia is. It's not a gossip site. And if there are "tons of comments" etc., then obviously this person is NOT going to great lengths to hide that it's her house, or she'd be more successful at it. Not everything is a conspiracy. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)