User talk:Stephen C Taylor

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Hungarian Grand Prix (June 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The lede sentence refers to 2019. This may be an incomplete rework of the 2019 article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 Hungarian Grand Prix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 Hungarian Grand Prix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from C'était un rendez-vous without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 2020 Formula One World Championship. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Please take you proposed change to Talk:2020 Formula One World Championship if you are being repeatedly reverted and try to persuade people that the information is notable there. Thank you,
SSSB (talk) 16:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 British Grand Prix (July 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2020 British Grand Prix. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A redirect already exists with this title in mainspace. WP:F1's convention is to develop such a redirect into a full article in the days leading up to the race. Contents from this draft can nevertheless be used for that purpose. Don't forget to provide proper attribution if content is re-used from here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 British Grand Prix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 British Grand Prix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 18:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 British Grand Prix (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2020 Formula One World Championship. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

See comments of previous reviewer. The race has not yet been held, and it is standard Wikipedia practice to incorporate information into the parent article until the race is held.

Do not resubmit this prior to the race without providing an explanation, in AFC comments or on the talk page of this draft, as to why a separate article is in order.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 British Grand Prix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 British Grand Prix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Moff Tarkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Hi. I noticed you recently added some sources to Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari. However, you only added bare URL's (links to the websites). You need to convert these to proper citations using templates such as {{cite web}}. Please see WP:CITE for more information.T v x1 17:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hi Stephen C Taylor, two things I want to talk about,

Minor edits[edit]

I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2020 British Grand Prix that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
SSSB (talk) 11:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of removed content[edit]

If you visit a page and see content you recently added has not been removed please do not re-add it (this constitues WP:edit warring. Instead please discuss the changes on the relevant WP:talk page. Thank you,
SSSB (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

Hi Stephen C Taylor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Avengers: Endgame that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Avengers: Endgame. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Chompy Ace. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Avengers: Endgame, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chompy Ace 20:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 Sakhir Grand Prix has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 Sakhir Grand Prix. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Sakhir Grand Prix (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, 2020 Sakhir Grand Prix, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 Sakhir Grand Prix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 Sakhir Grand Prix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stroll is not confirmed yet. We need to wait.[edit]

When the reliable source is ready we can include him.--Island92 (talk) 22:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Writing what can probably happen or not goes in contrast with the encyclopedia.--Island92 (talk) 22:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Formula One Grand Prix Wins By Kimi Raikkonen (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Kimi Räikkönen. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Formula One Grand Prix Wins By Kimi Raikkonen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Formula One Grand Prix Wins By Kimi Raikkonen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 00:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese race 2021[edit]

It's been removed from 2021 calendar. We do not have news from Liberty Media and reporting whether this race is going to take place or not. Its too Early.--Island92 (talk) 20:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020 Sakhir Grand Prix, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Russell for Mercedes needs a source Joseph2302 (talk) 09:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 British Grand Prix[edit]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/2020 British Grand Prix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 Hungarian Grand Prix[edit]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/2020 Hungarian Grand Prix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation[edit]

Don't add speculation like this to articles, we report what reliable sources have confirmed, not what people may do in the future. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning on Max Verstappen[edit]

Your recent editing history at Max Verstappen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Pyrop e 18:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2021 Formula One World Championship, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "The Emiligia Romagna Grand Prix held at Imola Circuit was also set to dropped has since been reinstated as a replacement for the aborted Vietnamese Grand Prix." is WP:OR, and also not true, as the TBC date is still TBC Joseph2302 (talk) 10:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton contract[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a liveblog about Hamilton future. Island92 (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 Formula One World Championship. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't difficult to add reliable sources if they exist. And if the sources don't exist, then it's speculation which shouldn't be added. Don't see what isn't clear about that. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: How have we got to an unsourced4 with a single warning within the last month and an addition of content which is clearly good faith? It's definitely on the editor to add citations but with this you could easily find a reference by a simple Google search. FozzieHey (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a warning for adding speculation as recently as yesterday, and an entire talkpage full of warnings for it (including an L2 last month) This is excluding all the times they've added unsourced material where a warning hasn't been added. I know many F1 editors are fed up at the unsourced speculation being added by this user. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the onus is on the user to add sources, not for other people to go find sources when others cannot be bothered. It's completely acceptable to revert unsourced material as per WP:VERIFY. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: Sure it's fine to revert it but it's not exactly helping the project when a citation can easily be found. I'd very much prefer if @Stephen C Taylor: could communicate and add citations to their edits and I'm not doubting that. I just don't think it's fine to post a template that assumes bad faith and threatens a block when clearly it was a good faith addition. FozzieHey (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FozzieHey: the additions are good faith, nobody denies that. However, continingly failing to add citations is considered disruptive. As much as I appreciate Stephen's contributions he must start citing his contributions.
SSSB (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And some more speculation: [1]. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephen C Taylor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 07:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Mads Mikkelsen. ALSO, the edit you made was not "minor". You have been asked not to mis-mark edits; please stop doing this. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 15:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Justice League (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 16:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rogue One, you may be blocked from editing. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 16:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 16:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rogue One, you may be blocked from editing. Your unexplained edits broke the infobox at the head of the article. PLEASE STOP DOING THIS! You are causing damage to the encyclopedia and wasting people's time. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 18:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friday practice session length[edit]

It's already explained here.--Island92 (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita Mazepin Russian flag entries[edit]

F1.com includes it. Island92 (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Joseph2302 (talk) 16:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for a long-term failure to abide by basic content policies, and refusing to communicate with other users. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, it is required that you be willing to talk to other users when they have concerns abut your edits..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email, but that's generally not how blocks are appealed. You need to read the above block message and respond here. Lack of on-wiki communication is part of why you are blocked, so it's kind of important that you show you are capable of it if you wish to be unblocked. A previously uninvolved admin will review your appeal. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what was unclear about the above message, I feel like I was pretty clear about how to proceed and that email was not the right way to go about it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2020 Austrian Grand Prix[edit]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 Austrian Grand Prix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Kimi Räikkönen[edit]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Kimi Räikkönen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Stephen C Taylor/sandbox/2020 Sakhir Grand Prix[edit]

Hello, Stephen C Taylor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/2020 Sakhir Grand Prix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]