User talk:Stonu2003

September 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of data-erasing software. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Will keep in mind! Stonu2003 (talk) 06:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Stonu2003 (talk)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of data-erasing software, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 07:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You seem to act on impulse and my assertions will be spelt out in the next few lines. Give me a credible point as to how I am disrupting and how my insertion was advertorial. All the lists in the page of List of data-erasing software have followed the same notability and structure that I did (most inclusions in the list have external links to their website and i dont know how it harms wikipedia's main concern. It simply takes user to know what the software. If it is so delete every inclusion that has external link. You are not God so please give credible explanation and I am at all my right to raise red flag against you. Stonu2003 (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

The article List of data-erasing software contains a list of notable companies, ie. those with Wikipedia articles, it is not an indiscriminate list of ALL data erasing software and logging out to continue edit warring is likely to lead to a block. Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You mean to say to have wiki article is the only way to be notable, instead of simply rejecting, being in denial and giving admonition and warning , the better way could be let me know the way out. DONT MAKE IT AN EGO ISSUE, it serves neither u, neither readers, wiki or me. Stonu2003 (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You mean to say to have wiki article is the only way to be notable, instead of simply rejecting, being in denial and giving admobishion and warning , the better way could be let me know the way out. DONT MAKE IT AN EGO ISSUE, it serves neither u, neither readers, wiki or me. Stonu2003 (talk) 09:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Reinsertion with removal of external link

Please be informed the same has been reinstated with adherence to Wikipedia guidelines and reviewer comment

Not always things are intentional. It was just following a template and style of earlier listing (Blancco). Apropos to your comment the same has been reinserted by removing the external link and following all parameters the other listing have done. Hope you wont delete this anymore.

Stonu2003 (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Stonu2003, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much. Am really glad that finally, you have shown me the way. I have studied deeply and am really well informed and aware about my mistake. Although I might make some and learn in the process. Thanks

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Stonu2003. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page List of data-erasing software, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shujakhan88 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shujakhan88. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)