User talk:Stratus.financial

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hyperloop Transportation Technologies seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a mistake. Can you reconsider? Stratus.financial (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that this block is due to a perceived lack of neutrality, as Wikipedia prioritizes unbiased information. I no longer found my edit on the article about Hyperloop Transportation Technologies as it was removed, but I assure you that my intention is to contribute accurate and balance information. My goal is to present fair information and maintain a neutral point of view. Stratus.financial (talk) 17:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Electric vehicle has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --Finngall ^talk 17:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that I've been blocked due to a copyright issue. In the future, I will ensure to paraphrase, write it in my own words when using external sources and provide proper citations. If needed, I will ask permission from the copyright holder. I will familiarize myself with Wikipedia’s guidelines and to appeal the block. Respect for others’ work is my top priority all the time. Stratus.financial (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added citation. Why is it copyrighted? Stratus.financial (talk) 18:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to address the recent block placed on my account due to the use of unreliable sources in my contributions. I realized that the sources I used were not in line to Wikipedia's standards for reliability and verifiability. I understand now the importance of using reliable sources to ensure the accuracy and credibility of information on Wikipedia. Moving forward, I will ensure to use only reliable and reputable sources for my contributions. I will also make sure to cite these sources correctly using inline citations. Moving forward, I will dedicate myself to following Wikipedia's guidelines and policies in order to maintain unbiased information on the platform. I kindly request for more information on how for the block to be lifted. I look forward to contributing positively to Wikipedia again. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Air traffic control. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that my account is flagged due to the addition of what has been classified as promotional material to the "Air traffic control" page. It was not my intention to use it as a platform for promotion. I am aware that my contributions were not in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. I value the importance of maintaining an objective and neutral point of view in all contributions. Rest assured that my intention was to enhance the content on Wikipedia and not to promote any product or service. Moving forward, I will strictly follow the Wikipedia's guidelines and ensure that all my contributions are informative, unbiased, and beneficial to the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your understanding and consideration to lift the block on my account. Stratus.financial (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. — Diannaa (talk) 00:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stratus.financial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account got blocked due to the impression that it was being used for advertising or promotion probably becasue of the username that seemed to represent a business or organization. While I am connected with a business, I never meant to use Wikipedia for promotion and I'm sorry that this happened. I am more than willing to change it to comply with Wikipedia’s username policy. I propose the new username: stratfin1234. I will provide accurate and fair information specifically relating to pilot training and aviation industry news. I believe my knowledge and experience in this area can be of value to the Wikipedia community. Lastly, I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s policies moving forward. I am eager to contribute positively to this community. I kindly request that you consider my appeal and I am open to any further conditions you might want to impose. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request, only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, you added copyright content on several articles: Electric aircraft, Container ship, and Electric vehicle. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. To do so is a violation of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cited my contribution. Can you reconsider? Stratus.financial (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content copyrighted elsewhere is not acceptable even if cited. You have not addressed your promotional username and your promotional edits. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is understood, and I thank you for that. Moving forward, I will add content that is original that does not infringe on any copyrights. Even if sources are cited, I will avoid copying the content from copyrighted sources, but instead I will express it in my own words or use a short quotation in reference to the source or to the author. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copy/pasting rubbish from copyrighted blogs into articles.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a mistake. Can you reconsider? Stratus.financial (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stratus.financial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account has indefinite block which prevents me to use the talk page due to the following reasons: copyright violations, disruptive editing, and not responding to concerns or previous block. This led me to the realization of my editing and contributing behavior. I am hoping that the block is no longer necessary, as I want to assure you that this won't happen again and will make productive contributions in the future instead. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Another duplicate request. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Stratus.financial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi HJ Mitchell! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community. Stratus.financial (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi HJ Mitchell! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community.  [[User:Stratus.financial|Stratus.financial]] ([[User talk:Stratus.financial#top|talk]]) 15:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi HJ Mitchell! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community.  [[User:Stratus.financial|Stratus.financial]] ([[User talk:Stratus.financial#top|talk]]) 15:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi HJ Mitchell! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community.  [[User:Stratus.financial|Stratus.financial]] ([[User talk:Stratus.financial#top|talk]]) 15:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

. Stratus.financial (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stratus.financial (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stratus.financial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

block is a mistake. citation is added

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stratus.financial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block placed on my account. I understand that my previous actions of copy/pasting copyrighted content into articles were against Wikipedia's policies. I see now how serious that was and the negative impact they had on the integrity of the Wikipedia community. I've taken the time to really understand Wikipedia's rules about copyrighted content and promotional behavior. I'm committed to following those rules from now on. I recognize how valuable it is to create your own content and why it's essential to honor the rights of creators. I really want to be a positive part of the Wikipedia community and I believe that I can do so while fully respecting the rules and guidelines. I kindly request that you consider lifting the block on my account. I'm eager to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community, and I'm confident that I can do it while following the rules and guidelines. Stratus.financial (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to tell us a new username that we can rename this account to. You will also need to(without the aid of an AI) tell us what was wrong with your edting and what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:CORPNAME[edit]

No one has noticed this the name of a company? IMO, renaming should be a condition of unblocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now I see it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a SPAMU template, but no SPAMUBLOCK. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that this account got blocked due to spamming activities, but it was not an intention to use this account for spamming but to make useful contributions. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that my username, being the name of a company, might seem like I am promoting or advertising, which is against Wikipedia’s username policy as per WP:CORPNAME guidelines. I am willing to change it to something that does not represent a business or website but to something more neutral and informative. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #87346[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledged the reason of my block and I will not repeat the kind of edits. I would like to appeal this block through the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) and change the username to new one. If my appeal will get rejected again, I will try to understand the reasons better and make a new one until I thoroughly understand the reasons. Stratus.financial (talk) 19:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChatGPT responses[edit]

Pasting in ChatGPT responses, such as all of the above on this user talk page and your latest unblock request is not helpful. You should write your own thoughts in your own words. MrOllie (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize. I understand that copying and pasting content from AI is against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I only used AI as a guide, but most of my responses and rephrased in my own words as I am aware of Wikipedia’s guidelines. Can you kindly walk me through the process on how to lift the block on my account? Stratus.financial (talk) 23:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvios, disruptive editing, no response to concerns or previous block[edit]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Stratus.financial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community. Stratus.financial (talk) 20:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community. [[User:Stratus.financial|Stratus.financial]] ([[User talk:Stratus.financial#top|talk]]) 20:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community. [[User:Stratus.financial|Stratus.financial]] ([[User talk:Stratus.financial#top|talk]]) 20:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi! I kindly request the removal of indefinite block from my account due to my disruptive editing behavior such as copy/pasting from copyrighted blogs into articles, in addition to no response made to concerns or previous block. I understand that following the Wikipedia’s policies is strictly implemented, and I commit myself to avoid repeating the same behavior again. Furthermore, I was still learning the policies, and now I understand this impact to my account. I wanted to respond diligently to some comments on my account, but due to the indefinite block, I was not able to do so. If you could kindly consider my request, so I can now positively put my commitment to practice and collaborate positively to the Wikipedia community. [[User:Stratus.financial|Stratus.financial]] ([[User talk:Stratus.financial#top|talk]]) 20:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You have three open unblock requests, which one do you want reviewed? Only a single open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 11:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One single open request at a time[edit]

Hi 331dot! I appreciate your response to my request. To answer your question, I prefer that my most recent request from the three open unblock requests be reviewed. Stratus.financial (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]