User talk:Stupidcupid6
September 2023[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Roosevelt Field (shopping mall), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Del Amo Fashion Center
- added a link pointing to Nike
- The Commons at Calabasas
- added a link pointing to Chico's
- Westfield Fashion Square
- added a link pointing to Tesla
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Consensus to change WP:TENANTS?[edit]
Where is the new consensus that has been reached to change WP:TENANTS? Alansohn (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Edits to Aéropostale (company)[edit]
You have reverted a number of edits to Aéropostale (company) with an edit summary that says Revert to edit with consensus reached on separate talk page. There does not appear to be any such discussion or consensus on the article talk page, unless I am missing something. Perhaps you could be more specific as to the consensus. In the meantime I have reverted to the previous version. Regards. Orenburg1 (talk) 07:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Edits to Lord & Taylor and other articles[edit]
I see that you are still trying to impose your preferred version on the intro to the Lord & Taylor article. It seems from your edit summaries to this and other articles that you believe consensus means agreement with your edits, such as your false claim of consensus at WP:TENANTS. This is not how Wikipedia works.
This seems to be part of a series of similar edits to mainly shopping mall and retail outlet articles by you and other editors such as user Angelwithin93, user Oopswediditagain (temporarily blocked), and IPs 173.242.96.122, 174.215.220.227 (temporarily blocked), 174.215.220.230 (temporarily blocked), 174.215.220.112 (temporarily blocked) and a good number of others.
You should cease this unconstructive editing and sockpuppetry. Orenburg1 (talk) 18:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.