User talk:Subsonic17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article: Curiosity - What's inside the cube?

Hi subsonic,

I'm new to editing things on wikipedia this is my first time so i'm still learning how to approach editing and discussing things with others on wikipedia.

anyway here is why i believe the cubelets on the edges do not affect other faces

http://i.imgur.com/NUZ1M.png http://i.imgur.com/lYWBR.png


These are screenshots of adjoining edges, in the pictures you can see one edge has cubelets and the other does not. if the cubelets on the edges took from the other faces you should be able to see the other face of the cube and the sides of the cubelets on the other face. right?

I'm sorry if i've put some strain on you with this whole thing, im just pretty much convinced that the edge pieces and corner pieces has 2 and 3 cubelets respectively instead of being individual cubes. I know i could be wrong though

thanks! Poppykin (talk) 04:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, Poppykin!
First of all, thank you very much for your message. I have viewed your pictures (although I'm not quite sure about what you wanted to show me with this first picture.
As for the second picture, I think that I seem to understand where you're getting at, but this picture only seems to suggest - but not prove - this. For a proof, one must view :such a corner piece from any three sides surrounding the cubelet, which is what I will do as soon as possible to check whether you're right (because you might be).
Also, since you're new to editing pages on Wikipedia, I would like to inform you that articles are not and never will be the right place to comment on what you agree or disagree with; that's what each article's "talk" page is for. You can access it when clicking on the top-left tab on an article that reads "talk". In this discussion, you can write anything you like. :)
I will try to look over the formulas and the game today, thanks so much for your feedback, again!
--Subsonic17 (talk) 08:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi again, never mind about that talk page comment. I just saw that you already found it. Good job, didn't even have to clean up! :)
--Subsonic17 (talk) 08:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]