User talk:Subwaymuncher/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Subwaymuncher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ansh 666 08:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Subwaymuncher/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 10:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi Subwaymuncher! You created a thread called Warning via Twinkle at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Subwaymuncher! You created a thread called Using the article's talk page as a draft page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Subwaymuncher! You created a thread called Drafting an article on a userpage at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maymay Entrata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantastica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Done.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Subwaymuncher/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Interstellarity (talk) 12:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Recent CSD

Hi Subwaymuncher. I have just removed the CSD template you put on Prathi Poovankozhi, which you tagged as CSD A1 and A3. Neither of those CSD categories are appropriate in this case. A1 articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. That does not apply here - although the article is short, it does state that it is an upcoming Malayalam film and lists the director and writer. A3 is for articles that have no content whatsoever, short of category tags, a rephrasing of the title, and so on. A3 explicitly says a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. I would also point out that you tagged this article a minute after it was created by a new user - tagging the article this quickly (even correctly) is not a nice way to treat new editors. Clearly the article needs some work but it does look like the editor who created it is still working on it. Why not give them some time to work on it before tagging it for deletion and come back later? If it still needs to improvements, perhaps you can give the editor some advice? WJ94 (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

WJ94 This is acknowledged. What would be the best course of action for these types of articles? I'm suggesting, since this is an article under construction found in the mainspace, maybe this can be worked on in a draft first? Sub |_HMU 14:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Subwaymuncher, thanks for your reply. The best course of action for these kinds of articles is to try and talk to the editor who created the article - you can see the note I left for their article creator on their talk page. I think your suggestion that this article be worked on as a draft is a good one - I suggested that to the editor who created this article and am currently waiting for a reply. If the editor does not reply soon (ie. withing the next couple of hours) then I will probably move the article to their userspace anyway - but I want to give them a chance to respond before I do that. Remember as well that Wikipedia is a work in progress - so long as there are no egregious issues with the page (vandalism, attack pages, BLP violations, copyvios, etc), then there is no harm in leaving it in the mainspace while a new editor is working out how Wikipedia works - especially if they get some gentle support from some more experienced editors at the same time. Even if this article turns out to not be notable and ends up userfied and doesn't make it back into the mainspace, the experience for the new editor is a positive one. WJ94 (talk) 15:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Subwaymuncher! You created a thread called Changing the color of the changes on a diff at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to a lot of reverts just recently, I award you this counter-vandalism barnstar! Thank you for the great work you are doing, keep it up! Puddleglum ^2.0 19:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Puddleglum2.0. Very much appreciated. :) Sub |_HMU 23:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

hhhh Billykdodo (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Edits for updating page

Hi! Wanted to update some info on Tango (Software) page. Most of info is old. It's not messenger anymore, it's live streaming platform from 2017. And the CEO is different now. How can I edit it right? Thanks in advance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tango_(software) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangoMeCo (talk • contribs) 13:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

TangoMeCo, if you are affiliated with Tango, then that may be a conflict of interest. COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. I would suggest checking WP:COI especially WP:COIEDIT. Sub |_HMU 13:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for help, checked the guide. So would it be better to propose changes on talk pages with up to date information (I mean with facts and links about the company)? Will conflict of interest be avoided? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangoMeCo (talk • contribs) 14:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

TangoMeCo, Yes that would be better, instead of editing the article directly only to be reverted by another user. Another is by posting a note on our Conflict of interest/Noticeboard so that they can be peer reviewed. Sub |_HMU 14:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Got it, thank you for help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.187.103.2 (talk) 07:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Edi Patterson

My client's birthday is incorrect. Why would you revert my changes? This is unacceptabl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccthompson14 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Replied to user's talk page. Sub |_HMU 19:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

kiernan shipka

you were so quick to point out my mistake why don’t u just do what i was trying to do and update the photo Keira1112 (talk) 19:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello Keira1112, I appreciate your efforts in adding a new picture for Kiernan Shipka. The reason for the revert is because the picture is coming from an external link, which will not show on the article. If you wish to add/upload a new photo to a Wiki article, I suggest you visit WP:IMAGES. As far as I know, usually, you may only add/upload a new picture to a Wikipedia article if you own the rights to the image, or if that image has previously been released under a licence which allows for it to be re-used for commercial purposes. - SUBWAY 19:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

the photo is from 2014 which is very old now so needs updating and I won’t do it since my edits just get changed straight away Keira1112 (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

@Keira1112: just so you know, your edit was reverted as a good faith edit cause clearly you were just trying to add a photo to a much more updated one. Other users are strict on this and might revert this and warn you. If you do not want your edits being changed, I would suggest using the sandbox so you can continue to make test edits without being unintentionally disruptive. - SUBWAY 23:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of User:Notty Mirza

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on User:Notty Mirza. I do not think that User:Notty Mirza fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because While poorly formatted and redundant, this could be the start of a plausible draft of an article, so U5 does not apply. I request that you consider not re-tagging User:Notty Mirza for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 09:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Whoops. I was focused on the website which is kinda similar to his username so I thought it was self-promotion. This is noted, and I'll do better next time. Thank you DESiegel and Happy New Year! - SUBWAY 12:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Subwaymuncher! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Username question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to RedWarn

Hello, Subwaymuncher! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

Easy to use - Unlike other tools, RedWarn uses easy to interpret icons and simple summaries for common actions, reducing both learning and reading times.
Supports rollback and rollback-like functionality - Unlike Twinkle, RedWarn supports both rollback and rollback-like functionality for users will rollback permissions. This decreases waiting times during rollbacks.

Making life easier on the battlefield - Ever been in the middle of a vandalism war or campaign, frantically reloading the history page to see a new edit? No more! Enabling RedWarn's "Alert on Change" feature will automatically send you to the latest edit when a new edit occurs - and if you're working on something else, RedWarn will send you a notification while the tab is still open in the background. No time wasted.
Rollback previews - If you're ever worried about the changes a rollback will make, especially in the case of reverting good faith edits, you can click the rollback preview button to preview the difference a rollback will make, with the version that will be restored on the right, and the latest revision on the left.

Always the latest revision - RedWarn will automatically redirect you to the latest revision if the rollback is no longer for the latest revision - no more frustrating errors.

Fast - RedWarn can automatically select a warning level, and, on vandalism and content removal rollbacks, automatically select a warning template.

Built on your feedback - RedWarn is receiving frequent feature additions and changes based on your feedback. If there's something you don't like, or would like to see, just say!

and many more features ...but I don't want to fill your userpage.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 35 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features which I haven't listed here. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 21:59, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

RedWarn - Quick Survey

Hello Subwaymuncher! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.

To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey

Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.

thank you

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear Subwaymuncher,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

WP:BITE

Please take it easy with RedWarn. Miniapolis 17:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Subwaymuncher! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Weird box, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hey. It appears you’ve removed my edit at Apollo Quiboloy. Mind explaining it to me why you removed it? To be honest, you’re making your edit quite biased by inadvertently siding with Quiboloy. I thought you wanted neutrality in articles? It’s not even neutral now. You’re omitting valuable information. You’re depriving the public of the real score they’re supposed to know. Isn’t that disruptive editing? RenzyBenzy (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

So I might reinstate some information back on the page. Would that be alright? You know, you don’t fully know who Quiboloy really is and you’re not a Filipino and a Davaoeño but you’re acting as if you’re one. Let us, Filipinos and Davaoeños, handle his article/page from now on, shall we? I believe we have equal privileges as Wikipedia editors. Now if you keep on usurping our privilege by unnecessarily reverting/removing our edits, what purpose shall we serve in this information platform? It’s not about the “disruptive” edits you might accuse us of again, but it’s our privilege to be able to contribute here. Good day, gentleman. RenzyBenzy (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

I’m sorry to say pero, buot-buot kaayo ka bai. Ayaw sige’g pataka’g hilabot sa mga ubang article na wala kay hibaw-an. Hawd-hawd kaayo ka’g dagway, mura’g kinsa dili ra ba. I suppose you should only edit articles that you honestly know you have experience on. You’re not a walking encyclopedia, right sir? I hope you understand my concern here. I feel offended, slighted, and devalued. I hope you loosen up a bit with your editing beliefs. Remember, it’s only a PRIVILEGE, not a RIGHT. RenzyBenzy (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

RenzyBenzy I already explained the reason for my edit on the edit summary. Also I am a Filipino, please check my userpage. - SUBWAY 00:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Edit summary box

Please use it^, I cannot read your mind and neither can anyone else, Repeatedly reverting without explanation could see you blocked from the project, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Davey2010, I'm not sure where you are going with this. I did use the edit summary box saying "Typo" [(Undid revision 969972970 by Davey2010 (talk) Typo)] cause it is indeed a typo? Then you reverted it asking me to explain why. Then I explained it in details, then you reverted it again only to edit it back just to prove what? I just find it easier to click undo than to edit it out. Nevertheless, was it also really that hard to check prev? I believe I should really not explain myself to you. Calling me an "absolute tool" was low and I refuse to further engage with you regarding this matter. Have a good day. - SUBWAY 20:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

My sincere apologies, I had completely missed that hence my warning and edits thereafter, Unfortunately it's a common occurrence where someone reverts you and doesn't bother explaining why (although you did explain!),

Anyway it would seem I'm the complete and utter tool in this case so apologies for that. Happy editing. –Davey2010^Talk 20:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Ian Taylor link

hi I was just wondering why the Ian Taylor link is not linking to his wiki page but to a random article could you advise my error — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitmapjunkie (talk • contribs) 14:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Bitmapjunkie, looking at the article David Ross, I see that Ian Taylor is linked to Ian Taylor (British businessman). I'm assuming this is the correct Ian Taylor based on your edit. - SUBWAY 14:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Subwaymuncher/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Notice

Please don't change our P-Pop Article please! Everyday we edit this please don't change it please Philippinesfan (talk) 04:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Philippinesfan, you do not own any article. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and has many of its pages open for public editing. Also, your edits on that article seem to be not helpful as you're adding a coatrack of large images that are really not an improvement.- SUBWAY 16:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Subwaymuncher/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Page

Hello I am Gregory Brown, CEO of Stackin Up Entertainment. Our Record Label has Major Distribution with EMPIRE as well as Major Distribution with The Orchard. We produced a record on Spotify that hit over 500k streams and we received a plaque for that. I would love to pay you respectfully to build a Wikipedia page for me. Stackinupent (talk) 00:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Your signature

Is basically the subway corporate logo. That's not ok. Please change it to something that does not look like a corporate logo. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Thanks for letting me know. I just tweaked the colors, hope that's okay! :) - SUBWAY 18:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Well, it's less obvious but the font choice and the shape are still pretty clearly intended to evoke the Subway franchise. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Is this better? – Subway 20:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes it is. I think that's far enough removed not to be an issue anymore. Thanks for your attention to this. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Subwaymuncher! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:57, Sunday, October 27, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Ian Taylor Link

Hi Subwaymuncher thank you. yes the profile is Ian Taylor on wiki but I have updated the wiki page link to the ROH link if that makes it easier and apologies for my noob edit ill do my best to improve and thank you for the assist.

You are invited to WikiProject Google!

Hello! I, Dh.wp (talk), would like to invite you to join WikiProject Google! We're working on:

Writing, cleaning up, and expanding articles about Google, in particular, these articles

Putting {{WikiProject Google}} on the talk pages of articles involving Google, and assessing articles with the template. This helps to categorize articles!

Sourcing a BLP affiliated with Google

Updating the project page or the portal, and spreading word about the project

and more!

It seems you might be interested, so please stop by! Thank you.

Bad speedy delete tagging

Warning: you inappropriately applied a U5 speedy delete tag to User:ExB Tayo!. Please take a look at WP:Userpages to see what is acceptable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: I understand. I saw a link to their Facebook page so I immediately speedy tagged it not knowing that it could be allowed. I'll be more careful next time. – Subway 08:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)