User talk:Sue De Nimes

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Thanks for spotting the glaring mistake on John Paul Getty, Jr. I don't know how that happened, but it's fixed now thanks to you. Exok (talk) 10:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cary Grant[edit]

A few years ago you participated in a discussion at Talk:Cary Grant about his citizenship. A recent RFC has begun on Cary Grants citizenship reference in the lead paragraph. Please feel free to add a comment at Talk:Cary Grant#RfC: Should the ambiguous hyphenated term, English-American, be used to describe the subject?.--JOJ ^Hutton 22:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Call to Action=[edit]

Sorry, but what is the evidence that the A Call to Action page is written 'to settle scores'. One enemy of the organization did edit in that spirit, but we have largely settled this, and I have put some of his points in while deleting his references to actual individuals. Was that what you had in mind? Tomcapa1 (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How on earth do you think your complete reversion to the old biased version of the article on Call to Action can be called 'neutral'? At best you had better negotiate with the editor of this version (Ryan), which I have restored. His contains most of the original material but also puts in places an alternative view-- this is what neutral means, not one-sidedness of the kind you resotred. I an going to report this for editing wars if you continue to act in this way and also suggest deletion of the original if you continue in this way as it does more harm than good as it stands Tomcapa1 (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tom - you seem to have a flawed understanding of how Wikipedia works. The 'A Call To Action' page was deleted because of its insufficient notability. Before that your clear conflict of interest was noted by several editors. Since then you seem to be running around attempting to instigate 'fights' with anyone you disagree with. You have been given repeated warnings over your disruptive editing and also over original research. Sue De Nimes (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]