User talk:Suluk Çor Kağan

July 2023[edit]

I am new to this whole editing thing and I never edited the battle of baykand? And I don't even know how to write message to you

Hello, I'm Wikaviani. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ottoman–Persian War (1743–1746) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do not change content according to your POV, thanks. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harass? Bro this is online how the fuck am I supposed to harass you from the other place of our planet on a fucking network connection yes my english is shit sorry but i dont know what all this stuff means you are telling me Suluk Çor Kağan (talk) 01:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When an editor asks you to not post on his talk oage and you keep posting messages, that means harassing said editor.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also editor and I also ask you not to post here anymor. Ok?. You are harassing me and this violating of the genova conventionals. Enaugh is enough Suluk Çor Kağan (talk) 01:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Muslim conquest of Transoxiana, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The information in the muslim conquest of transoxiana is FALSE. Its FAKE. Not TRUE, There are 0 sources 0 proof where it's stated that the Second Turkic Khaganate was involved in any battle or war against the Umayyads when they expanded towards Transoxiana. Neither was Kültigin, Kapgan Kağan, Bilge Kağan or Tonyukuk involved in any battle against the Umayyads. There was a page about the battle of Tashkent 713 about a battle between the Umayyads and Second Turkic Khaganate. It turned out to be FALSE and FAKE. Therefore it got removed from wikipedia. But at the same time while there's NO SOURCES and NO PROOF the Second Turkic Khaganate is listed in the Muslim Conquest if Transoxiana!? Suluk Çor Kağan (talk) 01:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please show me one SINGLE relaible source with proof and evidence that states that Kul Tigin, Bilge Kağan, Tonyukuk or Kapgan Kağan was involved in any battle against the Umayyads. I am trying to be objective and only show facts. But this page is full of nonsense and claims that are not backed by any reliable sources. Or any sources at all. Suluk Çor Kağan (talk) 01:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of the Baggage. Materialscientist (talk) 07:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalizing anything, the Battle of baggage was a Türgesh victory. Some arabic person vandalized the page by editting the results as a defeat for the Türgesh while in the "battle" section it is said that the attack of the Türgesh was a victory. Stop biased judgements Suluk Çor Kağan (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]