User talk:SunnyA

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sikmir for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

I received your email requesting unblocking. I'm afraid I can't help you, however, because I did not block you and because I am not a sysop and thus do not have the ability to block or unblock anyone. To request unblocking, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SunnyA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is your mistake. My english is not so good, but I'm real! There is discussion [1]. I am one of the developers of this OS. The proof is here [2], my nickname is same as here. I have been registered in WP 10:55, 17 October 2008. Please unblock me. SunnyA (talk) 08:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser result was confirmed. You need to address why you used multiple accounts to participate multiple times in the same discussion.Chaser (talk) 08:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is wrong[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SunnyA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You say that I am a sock puppet of Sikmir, but here [6] your can see that it is wrong. I am one of the developers of this project (my nickname SunnyA). Sikmir is another developer (his nickname Nikolay Korotky). Our profiles: [7] and [8]. I hopeit is a reliable proof. Thank you. SunnyA (talk) 4:48 am, Today (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

The admin who placed this on hold seems to have lost interest in resolving this one way or the other, and the blocking admin has indicated that they do not object to it being overturned. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to challenge this myself. Behavioral evidence does not match up. I'm going to ask the checkuser to take another look to see what's going on here. In the meantime, can you explain if you have any reason you and Sikmir might share the same IP address or computer? --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 10:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you take a close look at the WHOIS data for the IPs his story kinda makes sense. However there are a few too many accounts to explain away with that alone, it has to be meatpuppetry at the least. It might be advisable to unblock the two main accounts after explaining the sock policy to them. Brandon (talk) 08:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are from the same local network, so we have the same IP adresses. This is a local network of our company (Lanit-Tercom Inc.). SunnyA (talk) 10:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even if all that is being said is true, i.e. that everyone is in fact a different person and they all edit through the same IP address, the fact that they all work on the same project and showed up here to do nothing more than post "keeps" in the deletion discussion is strong evidence ofcanvassing and/or meatpuppetry which was not disclosed by any of the blocked accounts before or contemporaneously with editing in that discussion. If any or all of the accounts are unblocked or block-reduced, it should be done on the condition that they make the proper disclosure on their user pages and also on the deletion discussion page, so that the reviewing sysop there can know that all their opinions/!votes should only count as one, per WP:MEAT. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 22:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My (and others) keeps in deletion discussion are striked out. My IP is blocked. I can edit my talk page only. What's more? And what can I do? Regards, SunnyA (talk) 08:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear admins, and what about me? I'm sorry, but I don't understand what shall I do.. SunnyA (talk) 09:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

← Sorry for the delay. I commented here regarding this unblock request some time ago. Tiptoety ^talk 02:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]