User talk:Suntrax south

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Suntrax south, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Emmanuel George Cefai, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 06:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emmanuel George Cefai[edit]

The article Emmanuel George Cefai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 06:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Emmanuel George Cefai may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*www.poemhunter.com<ref>{{cite web|last=Lauria|first=Emile|title=Emmanuel George Cefai|url=http://www.poemhunter.com/emmanuel-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Energy, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emmanuel George Cefai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmanuel George Cefai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel George Cefai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suntrax south, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not sure exactly what to do or where to answer such claims. I did have an account a number of years ago with a similar user name along the lines of Suntrax however I had lost the password and have not been able to retrieve it due to losing access to the email address linked to the wikipedia account. Can this be proven some way or will my current account be deleted?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Suntrax south (talk • contribs) 18:42, 3 June 2014‎

Hi. I suggest you post your comment to the investigation page, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suntrax south. It's the proper place for it and there are people there with more experience and the relevant tools who may be able to help with deleting or blocking your old account.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 19:16, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't notice the case was moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SunTrax and then the case was closed, because as you said, there was no abuse and no one had edited from the old account in some years. So, no further action about that is required from you. --Bejnar (talk) 00:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How to avoid instant deletion[edit]

One good way to build an article that avoids instant deletion attempts is to do so in your sandbox, User:Suntrax south/sandbox/new article. Then when the article is ready, it can be moved into the article space. That gives you the benefit of all the Wikipedia tools without raising any ire among other editors, at least until you are ready. --Bejnar (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]