User talk:Super23user

This is Super23user's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Super23user/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Super23user! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Super23user/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Super23user/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Super23user/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Super23user/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Super23user/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Super23user/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much of the information is unreferenced. References aren't actually references if they don't support the content they're cited against; many seem to be just links to the source's home page, and as such have no use here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Super23user/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Abegg (June 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per previous declines and no improvement.

S0091 (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Abegg[edit]

Hello, Super23user. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Abegg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]