User talk:Supercooleskimo

Welcome!

Hello, Supercooleskimo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Meša Selimović. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The comment about proselytism was regarding the Wikipedia Cult issue described at this interview of Sam Vaknin which also contains this:

The participants in the cult are hostile to critics, the authorities, institutions, his personal enemies, or the media - if they try to uncover his actions and reveal the truth. The narcissist's cult is "missionary" and "imperialistic". He is always on the lookout for new recruits. He immediately attempts to "convert" them to his "creed" - to convince them how wonderful and admirable he - and, by extension, the cult - is. Often, his behaviour on these "recruiting missions" is different to his conduct within the "cult". In the first phases of wooing new admirers and proselytising to potential "conscripts" the narcissist is attentive, compassionate, empathic, flexible, self-effacing, and helpful. At home, among the "veterans" he is tyrannical, demanding, wilful, opinionated, aggressive, and exploitative.

This usage of the term proselytising was I referring to. "Him, he, his" is here in regard to Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales whom I've never met.

You really have Absolute zero (O K) to share about yourself? :-) Ok... for now. :-) Enjoy your stay and your wikiing. --Biblbroks (talk) 06:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

What can I say... Paranoia is a good friend of mine.

Well... you're welcome... I'll try to contribute some more vandalisms :)--Supercooleskimo (talk) 15:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Selimovic

Actually, you removed some info from the article, without giving a reason for that, and such action might be disputed by other editors. Anyway, I'm not completely against your edit, except for the Serbian Cyrillic designation: Serbo-Croatian Cyrillic might fit better.

A simple how-to put a reference:

• <ref name=vidan>Vidanović, Ivan (2006). ''Rečnik socijalnog rada'' Udruženje stručnih radnika socijalne zaštite Srbije; Društvo socijalnih radnika Srbije; Asocijacija centra za socijalni rad Srbije; Unija Studenata socijalnog rada. ISBN 86-904183-4-2.{{sr icon}}</ref>

This how-to is taken as an example from the article Balkanization. You might want to use {{sh icon}} instead of {{sr icon}}.

Što se tiče informacije da je bio u logoru tokom 42-43, ako misliš na "...he was arrested for participation in the Partisan anti-fascist resistance movement in 1943..." - ove dve možda i nisu baš u suprotnosti. Na primer: bio je u logoru, pa nije, pa je onda opet uhapšen - s obzirom da verovatno nije uhapšen dok je bio u logoru. :-) Pozdrav, --Biblbroks (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I wrote on the talk page before about the info I remowed (besides, all the info on his nationality is given later in the article). Well... I'm afraid it's going to be disputed anyway. About the "Serbian Cyrilic" thing... I don't know which designation is used here - current one, or the one used during his life? I thought it's logical to use the current one. I guess it's not suposed to inform how his name was written in Serbo-croatian cyrilic, but how it's written today in Serbian. Even here, the article about that alphabet is titled "Serbian cyrilic". It will redirect you if you look for "Serbo-croatian cyrilic"

Јој мрзи ме сад да мозгам шта треба да мењам код референци и како... Ионако су у питању општепознате ствари. Могуће је то што причаш за логор, само унело би забуну да сам само унео овај податак о 42-43. и оставио стари, а пошто немам више информација о томе, нисам хтео ништа да дирам.--Supercooleskimo (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)