User talk:Superhonestreliablesource
February 2022[edit]
Hello, I'm InterstateFive. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Domino's Pizza have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster talk 18:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Unblock request[edit]
Superhonestreliablesource (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am truly sorry i was only testing out edits and i made bad mistakes, i am a teacher and i wish to be unbanned to help improve the wikipedia community, help write articles, and be trusted once again. i made a very bad mistake so i hope i can find some way to build up my trust. once again i am truly from the bottom of my heart sorry. Superhonestreliablesource (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Read our guide to improving articles.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
- Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
{{infobox name|...}}); - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:
[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]); - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
[[Category:Name]]); - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
{{Foo stub}});
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
- Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this:
== [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet; - Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "
Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution." - You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:
{{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
- Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Superhonestreliablesource (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have started my journey to getting my trust back Superhonestreliablesource (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were offered a pathway forward above. Please either make use of it, or convince an administrator to unblock you without using it and explain why you don't wish to use it. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello! I do not know if this message will reach the same admin of Wikipedia or not, but my changes have started. I understand that I cannot gain trust back immediately, but I have read the articles recommended to me and tried to find articles to clean up. for starters, I do not claim IAR. I made the mistake of not realizing everyone can see the changes I make.I take full responsibility for all of my actions. Next, I hope to expand stubs, as writing and history are my two favorite subjects (and i teach history). I have also found an issue in the wiki article of "Ice Stock Sports" already. I believe that there should be a space between ice and stock. Upon research I think that there are a few more mistakes in that article so I hope anyone, even if it isn't me, can help edit those articles that are marked as "need to be cleaned up" and "stubs" turn into verified wikipedia articles. thank you for your time.
@Yamla:
this is regarding my blocked status. I am in no way trying to be greddy, but i am wondering because i am new to wikipedia if you recived my last message to you? if not that's perfectly fine. Thanks!
- If you wish to be unblocked, I strongly suggest you follow the path I offered you above. No need to ping me. --Yamla (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copied content from icestock sport; see that article's history for attribution[edit]
Source: Vatikan Library, Rom (Pope Celestine III excommunicated Leopold V), and University Library of Karlsruhe at a time when it still was publicly accessible
this page may need to find a way to conceal their sources like in a tab, don't think there supposed to be out like this. also spacing issues between ice and stock seem to be an issue throughout the article
Copied content from Syracuse, New York; see that article's history for attribution[edit]
As of the census of 2010,[38] there were 145,170 people, 57,355 households, and 28,455 families residing in the city. The racial makeup of the city was 56.0% White, 29.5% African American, 1.1% Native American, 5.5% Asian, 0.03% Pacific Islander, 2.7% from other races, and 5.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents of any race were 8.3% of the population.
The largest ancestries include African (29.5%), Irish (18.4%), Italian (15.3%), German (9.6%), English (4.5%), and Polish (3.6%).[39] Non-Hispanic Whites were 52.8% of the population in 2010,[40] down from 87.2% in 1970.[41] Suburbanization attracted residents outside the city, even as new immigrant and migrant groups increased.
There were 57,355 households, out of which 29% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 9.3% were married couples living together, 20.8% had a female householder with no husband present, and 50.4% were non-families. 38.4% of all households were made up of individuals, and 10.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.31 and the average family size was 3.14.
The city’s age distribution was as follows: 19% of residents were under the age of 15, 23% from 15 to 24, 25.6% from 25 to 44, 21.7% from 45 to 64, and 10.5% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 29.6 years. For every 100 females, there were 91 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 87.89 males.
According to the 2014 estimates from the American Community Survey, the median income for a household in the city was $31,566, and the median income for a family was $38,794. Males had a median income of $39,537 versus $33,983 for females. The per capita income for the city was $19,283. About 28.2% of families and 35.1% of the population were below the poverty line, including 50% of those under age 18 and 16.7% of those age 65 and over.
As of 2017, the United States Census Bureau indicated an estimated population of 146,396.
According to the 2010 United States Census, the population ages 16 and older commuted to work as follows:
64.1% drive alone 9.7% carpool 11.4% walk 8.6% use public buses (CENTRO) 1.2% bike 1.6% use a taxicab
As of the 2020 census on april 1st, the population is estimated to be 148, 620. 6.2% of the population is under 5 years, 21.5% of people are under 18 years, 12.6% are 65 and over.Also 52.4% of the population are women.The race and Hispanic origin data show that 54.8% of residents are white alone, 30% are black or African American alone, 1% of people are American Indian or Alaskan Native alone, 6.5% are Asian alone, appx 0% are Native Hawaiian or other islander aone, 5.4% are two or more races, 9.4% are Hispanic and Latino, and 50% are white alone, not Hispanic or Latino. This is not updated in the 2020 census but as of 2019, 5,646 veterans through 2015 or 2019 lived in Syracuse, and 13.1% of the population were people born foreign. No housing, families/living arrangements, computer and internet use, education, health, economy, transportation and poverty statistics were updated in the 2020 census.
source used for information: census.gov.
References
== Syracuse, New York ==
==
Superhonestreliablesource (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have edited a few articles the way the unblock request showed me. I would just like to bring these t attention even if i don't get unblocked. i am new to wikipedia so i just wanted to insure that those edits are correct and i did this the correct way. if i am doing something wrong, please let me know! i am trying my best to build up my trust with the wikipedia community. Superhonestreliablesource (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One open unblock at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
==
Superhonestreliablesource (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have edited a few articles the way the unblock request showed me. I would just like to bring these t attention even if i don't get unblocked. i am new to wikipedia so i just wanted to insure that those edits are correct and i did this the correct way. if i am doing something wrong, please let me know! i am trying my best to build up my trust with the wikipedia community. Superhonestreliablesource (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Upon reviewing your previous edits and unblock requests, it doesn't seem like you have the required competence in written English to edit Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Superhonestreliablesource (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry. I do not have a reason but if you unblock me I will make you happy. I refuse to make wikipedia a worse place and my past actions were dumb, unnecessary, and make me feel ashamed of myself. I can do better if one person gives me a chance. Thank you for your time and consideration.Superhonestreliablesource (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. —ScottyWong— 03:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello my dearest friend Yamla. I understand why you blocked me but may I have a second chance? I am being much better and I am very happy to announce I am better!
- I did not block you. that was Discospinster. You have not yet followed the path I offered you to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 13:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
@Discospinter:[edit]
Hello Discospinter. It has been brought to my attention you blocked me! I am sorry for what i've done but I have followed the path provided and would love a second chance. sincerely, superhonestreliablesource. Thanks in advance!
Hello Discospinter. It has been brought to my attention you blocked me! I am sorry for what i've done but I have followed the path provided and would love a second chance. sincerely, superhonestreliablesource. Thanks in advance
Hello Discospinsterr. It has been brought to my attention you blocked me! I am sorry for what i've done but I have followed the path provided and would love a second chance. sincerely, superhonestreliablesource. Thanks in advance
Thank you for that valuable piece of information my dear friend, I hope our friendship can blossom like the cherry trees of northern china.
Hey best friend! So, how are you today. I enjoy our amazing friendship, although it feels one sided. So please yamla do your part in our friendship and water the cactus of friendship. Thank you my dearest friend.
Superhonestreliablesource (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry for the mistakes I made I have provided edits to articles that needed to be improved, and worked to make myself a better wikipedia article. So if I can convince one person to give me another chance, please. I beg you to let me have one chance. I am truly better now. I have followed the guide to unblockes and I need just one person to give me a chance. sincerely, superhonestreliablesource Superhonestreliablesource (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even if I were to pretend that things like this or this were not blatant trolling, it would be pretty obvious that this is going nowhere. TPA revoked. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en
wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).
is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Superhonestreliablesource/sandbox[edit]
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Superhonestreliablesource/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)