User talk:Swdavis67

		Quick Links for MedCab Case: Cases/TechCrunch
		Talk:TechCrunch

There is an WP:Mediation Cabal case to resolve whether or not the "criticisms" in the TechCruch article should or should not remain. As one of the editors participating in the matter, you are invited to help in the resolution. For more info please follow above links. Wikidemo 03:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted your changes to the TechCrunch Article[edit]

Swdavis67,

I reverted your changes to the TechCrunch article. I can see you were invited to the TechCrunch Mediation last month which resolved the wording of the criticism section. That was your opportunity to participate in discussion. Jonathan Stokes 07:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm reverting again. The question of the TechCrunch "criticism" section was brought up and dealt with in a mediation procedure that you were invited to join. The section was largely removed for reasons that are made clear in the mediation case history. Please respect Wikipedia process and the outcome it creates rather than taking things into your own hands. Adding the deleted material repeatedly in the face of the mediation result runs against the spirit and rules of Wikipedia. If you still disagree and want to make your case there are still several levels of review available to you and if your argument is the better one you should be able to convince people -- check the Wikipedia policy on mediation / arbitration. Wikidemo 05:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A link to the dispute options. At this point we've tried informal mediation so if you disagree it appears that formal mediation or arbitration are your best bets. Wikidemo 05:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we did our best. You continue to engage in an edit war and are obviously not interested in following Wikipedia rules and policies. I'm reverting again and reporting your account and the article in question to the moderators and/or arbitration committee. Wikidemo 02:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC). Update: you have already been reported to Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism so I took no further action. Please do not continue to edit the TechCrunch article. You were warned plenty of times. The Wikipedia hierarchy can take it from here. Wikidemo 02:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough[edit]

You're exausting the patience of other users could lead being blocked. Either work somthing out or refrain from your recent behavior. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 03:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and it's editors are a farce[edit]

I only posted facts and did no vandalism, show me the vandalism? Removing my information and replacing it with marketing speak from Mike Arrington is vandalism.