User talk:Swim19

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Grant23 (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

CIreland (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swim19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason for unblock

Decline reason:

No reason provided. Please see also our Guide to Appealing Blocks for some guidance as to what you need to include in an unblock request. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 18:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swim19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I've been accused of being the same person as Grant23. I am not. I made an account here to help keep the article as balanced as possible. One of the reasons cited for the block is that I sign off the same way as Grant23. As far as I know, I am signing off, as per the rules, using (Swim19 (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)), so I do not see that as a valid reason for being blocked.[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser is pretty reliable, and you are acting as a textbook example of sockpuppet behavior; I think that, if you check the mirror again, you might see Grant23's face looking back at you. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey, I'm really sorry about this. I see that you're fighting the ban. I'm trying to talk to the admin who did it but we'll see.

I have an idea, let's both edit the talk page at the same time so he knows we aren't the same person http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sam_Korn. What time works for you? I should be home most of Sunday. Let me know on my talk page and sorry! Grant23 (talk) 03:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]