User talk:Swordmark45

November 2013[edit]

Hello, Swordmark45, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Nova (Richard Rider) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edits to Nova (Richard Rider) here, here and here, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

Keep in mind also that altering the name of the category at the bottom of the article breaks the wikilink to that category, as you can see with the red link that shows up in the Categories here and here. If you're new to Wikipedia, please preview your edits, and/or check them after saving them, so that they do not result in errors like these ones. If your edits end up creating such errors and you can't fix it, try asking other editors like myself for help.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand this statement. It is sad that the truth can be get the day of light. It is just another sign that a corporation can take advantage of a sixteen your old boy and take a well plotted outline from him without recognition. It is evident that it was well thought out since it was printed. swordmark45 (talk)