User talk:T5r4e3wnc

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Yellow-billed Loon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Closedmouth (talk) 08:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lauren Southern without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to NeoGAF— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ned Kelly[edit]

Hi Yellow-billed Loon,

Thanks for helping fix the vandalism at Ned Kelly. The best way to fix complex vandalism like that is to look in the page history. That way you can find the vandal edit(s) and revert them entirely, so you know nothing is missed.

Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 12:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of birds of British Columbia edits[edit]

Your extensive additions to List of birds of British Columbia need to have their source(s) cited in the article. Please add them; if you're unsure how to do this, see Help:Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Craigthebirder (talk) 13:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dasha Nekrasova[edit]

If you want to nominate the article for deletion then you'll need to add the following to it:

filling in a suitable reason. Hut 8.5 22:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ribbon seal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squamish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of vandalism[edit]

Regarding this? Read WP:Vandalism. My edit was not vandalism, which is why you were reverted by another. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLP discretionary sanctions alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated attempts to add disputed content regarding a biography subject sourced to a completely unacceptable Twitter account to articles is unacceptable. You appear to have a particular dislike for Dasha Nekrasova and Red Scare (podcast). I suggest you leave your personal opinions at the door and avoid these articles altogether if you can't edit the topic neutrally.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Herman Cain.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T5r4e3wnc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account was given a permanent suspension. Multiple people used (past-tense) this account. I see the vandalism committed by this account, know who did it, and will change the account password if unblocked. I mostly use Wikipedia for information on ecology. T5r4e3wnc (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, duplicate request. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T5r4e3wnc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account was given a permanent suspension. Multiple people used (past-tense) this account. I see the vandalism committed by this account, know who did it, and will change the account password if unblocked. I mostly use Wikipedia for information on ecology.T5r4e3wnc (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If multiple people have used this account, then this account is WP:Compromised, and will not be unblocked unless we confirm its really the original owner operating it. Regardless, I somewhat doubt that this account was compromised, and I suggest you be entirely truthful. If it turns out your account was not compromised and technical evidence shows as much, you will likely remain blocked for good. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.