User talk:ZEdzEd3168

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:TEntEn4279)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TEntEn4279, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --逆襲的天邪鬼 (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

安全提醒[edit]

英文維基百科不允許建立模仿系統界面的頁面(我也是才知道的)。--逆襲的天邪鬼 (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Block[edit]

Same as Chinese Wikipedia,I've realized Sockpuppetry is wrong,and I apologize for all Wikipedia,I promise I will follow the rule of Sockpuppetry,and try to control myself hard under Asperger syndrome and other mental illness,if you can give me, a young kid a chance,it'll be really appreciated,thanks a millon! I'm trying hard not to hurt myself,and I don't want to be in danger again,to be out of the darkness,I've been trying hard to control myself,and other things that could put me in big pressure in reality,I don't want to be hurt again,the bad situation like this almost put me at the edge of the cliff,I was sitting on the window and almost jumped,if you can have a talk with me,it'll be very good to decrease my pressure a lot,thank you,again!4279計算過程 10:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


In that time when you were blocked and unblocked in Chinese Wikipedia, I and User:GZWDer both already reminded you of hanging template {{unblock}} on your English talk page. I don't understand why you haven't hung the template until now. Please hung it by yourself.

@Callanecc:, @BU Rob13:, @DeltaQuad:, I'm very sorry to disturb you. User:ZEdzEd3168 had both apologized for his fault in public in Chinese Wikipedia and English Wikipedia, and Chinese Wikipedia's administrators already unblocked him a few months ago. I think that he is young and he didn't know the rules so he played a trick on User:Dragoon17cc with making puppets. For his awareness of his mistakes and his psychological fragility, I hope you can unblock him. Please give him a chance and then he can follow the rules all along. --空间的拓荒者 (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I...still have the willing to contribute,I think... but everyone hates me now...they would...4279計算過程 06:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some appeal? Dragoon17cc?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZEdzEd3168 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@GZWDer: @Callanecc:I apologize for using multiple accounts. But here's something I need to say:I'm not User:Dragoon17cc. I'would like to appeal for this. Dragoon17cc made multiple account on Chinese Wikipedia,and I played a trick on them. I'm sorry for this. But Dragoon17cc is different from me. He made his first account on 2005.(Dragoon16c) How would I be able to edit at that time? I was just one year old. Please notice this. I don't deny I used some accounts to play tricks. But I don't want to create something strange:"A user who made several edits since he's one year old,2005." {\displaystyle 10^{2}} 10^{2}4279計算過程 02:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, you were blocked for socking - you admit you were socking, but this one sock might not be yours. I don't believe unblocking would benefit the encyclopedia. SQLQuery me! 03:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Alexander Misel:(The Chinese Admin who confirmed my sockpuppetery.) Would you take a few moment to explain that Dragoon17cc and I are different person,please? 4279計算過程 02:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They can prove that we are not the same person. Please separate us to different sockpuppet investigation pages soon.4279計算過程 02:35, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Outlookxp:(Also a good admin.) Can you explain this,too? You understand the situation of Dragoon17cc and I,too. Thank you. 4279計算過程 02:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also apologize for my few sockpuppets. But,please separate Dragoon17cc's and mine first. 4279計算過程 02:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have posted it to WP:AN to gain more attention. --B dash (talk) 03:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. =) 4279計算過程 03:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It worries me that you were JUST unblocked, and you show up here. SQLQuery me! 03:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SQL:I'm not Dragoon17cc,@B dash: can explain this. I'm not even unblocked,because Dragoon17cc and I are different person. I am ZEdzEd3168 and I used some sockpuppets and it confused people,so they thought I am Dragoon17cc,but Dragoon17cc's first account was created on 2005,and I was only one year old. It's going to be strange if I start edit since I'm one year old .@B dash: knows this. 4279計算過程 04:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According his User page,he's already a student or a teacher in a university,and I'm only a young person in a different school. 4279計算過程 04:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dragoon17cc claims he didn't use any sockpuppet,he did not apologize,I'm the one who apologize. His sockpuppets are not mine,my sockpuppets do not belong to him.4279計算過程 04:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "this sockpuppet"? I'm ZEdzEd3168,I'm the one who admit using sockpuppet, Dragoon17cc used sockpuppets,too,but he didn't admit at all. Do not try to link different person together. 4279計算過程 05:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About your appeal[edit]

Hi, I have removed the reference of your age from this page. Please don't make reference of your age. I will be taking a look at your appeal. In the meanwhile, you may want to e-mail arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org for appeals that contain personal information. This is probably necessary because you are contesting that your account was unrelated to Dragoon17cc, while the technical details confirmed there was a connection. Regards, Alex Shih (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dragoon17cc, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

B dash (talk) 06:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

@Bbb23:May I request a SPI for Dragoon17cc? I only made two accounts that took three NATO phonetic alphanets,ghi,jkl,which are Golfhotelimdia,Juliettkilolima,and Dragoonc17cc has ABC,jkl,which are Alphabravocharlie,Deltaechofoxtrot.

I have another account which is 「被你重視的歡樂」,and Tenten4279 is my previous account,now I'm renamed But Dragoon17cc and I aren't related.4279計算過程 22:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your account has been briefly checked. I think we are fine to separate you from Dragoon17cc. Please write a standard offer request that explains the rather confusing chronology that led to your current block, so one of us can post it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for the community to offer their input. Regards, Alex Shih (talk) 05:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think you better follow the Stardard offer, waiting 6 months without socking. The date of standard offer should be February 28, 2018. --B dash (talk) 06:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZEdzEd3168 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't use any other sockpuppets or evade my block through IP for past six months. I followed standard offer. I promise not to use or create any sockpuppet to lead a block. I'll also control my mental illness so I won't play trick anymore. I'm sure that it won't happen again. I'm here to request someone to post this to WP:AN. 10 2 {\displaystyle 10^{2}} 10^{2}4279計算過程 08:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The discussion here shows that the community of editors does not trust you enough to be unblocked. De728631 (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I was just a child who made something that seems to be "fun" to me,and for now,I learned,I changed. I understand that it is not funny at all,and I controlled my mental illness very hard.

I will not make any inappropriate things that lead a block,I can understand if you do not care about my situation,I just want to contribute here like I contribute at Chinese Wikipedia. 4279計算過程 08:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • For the things I'm going to do after get unblocked, I'll try to fix some grammar error or something like that. I've already contributed on Chinese Wikipedia for months or years. Second, I did help new user s and guide their articles to draft space,and help them constructing the drafts,together,on Chinese Wikipedia.

I have experience on collaborate with others. Please understand the true situation of Dragoon17cc and I. You are free to check me,our socks are separated, and I did not create any accounts for past six months.4279計算過程 10:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • For the reviewing admin, please see this thread at AN where the unblock was submitted to the community. There was little comment there, but what commentary did exist was opposed to unblocking from my reading. I'm not going to review this as I commented on that thread, but worth noting. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CU[edit]

If there's another checkuser, it'll show that one of the IP I logged in is in an IP range that was previously used by User:Nipponese_Dog_Calvero, and it may lead to another wrong conclusion. I decline to link with the user for simply using the same range. 4279計算過程 09:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]