User talk:TVshot

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Hans Reiser, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. John Vandenberg 23:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Carl Steadman, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. John Vandenberg 00:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My edits contain nothing but truthiness. This is apparently a difficult concept for you WikiNazis to grasp. Do some actual research before vandalizing my contributions, douchebag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVshot (talk • contribs) 00:24, 22 February 2007

You may have more fun over on Uncyclopedia. John Vandenberg 01:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey look, it's true! [1] Reiser is dead! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngryMcKilty (talk • contribs) 00:28, 22 February 2007

Nina Reiser has been presumed dead. John Vandenberg 01:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Participating in the project

TVshot, it seems like you don't want to participate in Wikipedia on the same basis that the project's goals are focused on. Vandalizing articles is not funny, it's destructive. Truthiness is not funny here. If that's your goal, you should move on and stop trying to participate here. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 01:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on Carl Steadman are the precise definition of Original Research. Find a ciation out there that says he died, dont' say "Well, I think he did, because xyz".

Truthiness is a really bad precedent. Don't do it. Either you can source the info, or it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Georgewilliamherbert 02:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Truthiness

Hello. You seem to be adding comments to an article suggesting that someone is dead, citing truthiness, your own research, and nothing else. Wikipedia takes biographies of (potentially) living people very seriously, and claims like these without reliable sources are unacceptable. Please don't add them again without a reliable and verifiable source. Thanks. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 02:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Hello TVshot. Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noted some of your recent edit summaries and comments and, as an administrator here, would like to offer you a friendly reminder of our civility and no personal attacks policy. Please treat other editors with respect and refrain from commenting on them, instead keep your comments limited to their edits. These sorts of comments are unacceptable, [2] [3] [4] even if the edits themselves are helpful. Thanks for your consideration. Rockpocket 05:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"

Nothing I have done qualifies as vandalism under WP:VAND. Please read the definitions there before making such accusations. --Eyrian 23:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your threat on User talk:Eyrian to edit war

Your edit threatening edit war on Eyrian ( [5] ) is inappropriate and uncivil ( WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL ) and borders on a threat to commit violations of our three-revert policy ( WP:3RR ).

I commend you for having moved away from your prior vandalism, but these threats today are also strongly inappropriate. Please stop making them and act in a reasonable and adult manner here. If you carry through and initiate an edit war on these topics, you will be blocked. Georgewilliamherbert 03:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TVshot

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Anthem 14:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what type of nonsense was going on between you and the anons, but your personal attack got someone's attention. So I deleted the page before reviewing. I restored the original version, leaving the other nonsense deleted. Please contact me if you have any questions and please be more circumspect in your opinions. To be honest, it looked like the sort of dazzling repartee one finds on FaceBook. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 14:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]