User talk:TaiXuan91

This is TaiXuan91's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: GNU Moe (April 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources provided. See WP:GNG for additional details on determining whether a topic is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GNU Moe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TaiXuan91! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's complex pages confuse me a little, so I sent this message a few times in different ways to make sure you could see it.

The reasons for rejection are ridiculous. GNU Moe is software. I quoted GNU Moe's official website in reference. There are detailed software documents and source code download addresses on its official website. I don't know what is more reliable source than the official website for a software.

Judging from the reviewer's personal homepage, the reviewer's professional field is history. And this is a software entry. Giving empty, unconstructive comments on articles in a different field is a very poor review response.

I don't think the reviewer would like his history paper to be sent to a physicist for review. Not to mention the opinion of physicists is to add more mathematical formulas. TaiXuan91 (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would encourage you to consider reviewing Wikipedia's policies and guidelines a bit more, many of which are accessible from this page. One very useful page for you might be this one on writing your first article. Please refrain from personal diatribes; see Wikipedia's civility policy here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]