User talk:Tapmani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Tapmani! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 17:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Hi Tapmani, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jones Act[edit]

hi Tapmani, not a big surprises except I kinda wonder why anyone in Burundi would care about the Jones Act :)

Actually, the change was constructive. The Jones Act was written and invoked to avoid the events that occurred in World War I. It's very unlikely that that same situation would ever occur again, time moves on. 1938 was not 1917. 2024 is definitely not 1920. So really, what the Jones Act will prevent is the difficulties encountered due to the situation of 1917. My edit clarified that, but no surprise that people with a narrower view would not see that.

Eden (Name)[edit]

Stop vandalizing this page. I am calling the guards on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.225.153.245 (talk) 06:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I am kind of interested that you would even care. Out of curiosity, how does the Jones Act affect you ?

cheers :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.160.68.16 (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Ugbedeg per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ugbedeg. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 10:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]