User talk:Tarin7767

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Tarin7767, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tails Wx 04:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Tarin7767! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 04:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now see if everything is ok.? If correct please make public and if wrong please let me know Tarin7767 (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is literally no content to review. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanvir Hayder (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft just documents his existence, it does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose to say about him and what makes him important as a journalist- as we call it, how he meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

331dot (talk) 08:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanvir Hayder (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop wasting peoples' time.[edit]

You have been told repeatedly why Draft:Tanvir Hayder has been rejected. The individual clearly doesn't meet Wikipedia notability guidelines, and isn't going to get an article. Tinkering around with titles while again citing the subject's own website isn't going to fool anyone, and if you persist in wasting our time, you may very well find yourself blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abed Sarker (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 03:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have given 5 correct references. But why is it not accepting? Tarin7767 (talk) 03:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanvir Hayder (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abed Sarker (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Vanity press and no claims to notability
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock my IP Address Tarin7767 (talk) 05:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The block applies to you as a person, not just to the Tarin7767 account. Your IP is blocked to prevent you evading the block, either by editing without signing in, or by creating a new account. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Cabayi (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]