User talk:Taterboy10

Hello, I'm NawlinWiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Red panda because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

I WILL CONTINUE TO EDIT WHATEVER I WANT

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Red panda with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 18:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Red panda, you may be blocked from editing. MarnetteD | Talk 17:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Tate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tate was changed by Taterboy10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-10-30T16:31:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Red panda because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 16:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Red panda. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Red panda was changed by Taterboy10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-11-01T16:42:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)