User talk:Taxcat

Welcome!

Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia! Fun and Interesting Articles Userpage guidelines Load a random article! Userbox directory Join a WikiProject Are you a Wikipediholic? The top editors The motto of the day Some really bad ideas..... The Department of Fun! Wikisongs!! Some new article ideas Some very odd articles..... List of the newest users Barnstars! List of user rewards List of pages most vandalized Very frequently asked questions Jimmy Wales, owner of Wikipedia The reward board (earn $$$) Get articles to edit from SuggestBot Find out how many edits you have! Hello, Taxcat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Keep cool   Share your knowledge   Get adopted   Neutral point of view And here are several pages on what to avoid: How to avoid Copyright infringement How not to spam Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might be interested in the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your editing; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome!  Gman124 talk 00:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Jose A. Cabranes

Hello Taxcat and welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your additions to the article Jose A. Cabranes for the following reason: Wikipedia policy requires that new information and additions to an article provide and cite a reliable verifiable source as proof of allegations. This is especially true in the cases where the subject of the article is still alive. I hope that you understand and if you need any advice feel free to get in touch with me. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Jose Cabranes

Anything about a person's biography should include the good the bad and the ugly,, And what I said is the true ugly

• Taxcat, I couldn't agree more with you, however we are dealing with an encyclopedia here which has rules that must be followed. It is required that all additions are welcomed as long as a "reliable verifiable" source is provided and cited. Those are the established rules in Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if the information in the person's Bio is negative or positive, or if the person adding the information has a personal agenda against the subject in question, as long as there is a reliable verifiable source that can proof the person's allegations (I'm sure that you can find a reliable Internet source). Those editing Wikipedia "must" follow the rules, otherwise their insistence of adding material without any evidence to back them up will be deemed as vandalism and the person may be blocked from editing. I personally don't care about the subject in question, like I stated before, I agree that both the good and the bad should be added, however my concern here is that our rules be followed. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

so why dont you assist me because I want to document the ugly and it is public such as motions, docket sheets and rulings

• Find a reliable website (newspaper article, court documentation or something similar) that can back-up your claim. Then come to my "talk page" and let me know and I will explian about the referencing. When you send me a message remember to sign with four ~~~~. Tony the Marine (talk)

01:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

• I will do the proper research with the help of my lawyer and contact you. Thank you

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Denny Chin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC)