User talk:Tbma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 13:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Tbma (talk) 19:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Posse72[edit]

It's not actually forbidden to remove warnings from your user talk page, because we assume that removing a warning means the user has read it. {{uw-tpv3}} is for editing comments on article talk pages. Bart133 t c @ 17:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I didn't knew that. In any case I want him to stop personal attacks, that is all. --Tbma (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock?[edit]

It's been suggested that you are a sock of YMB29 (talk · contribs). Are you? Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am certainly not. And that is easily verifiable by any user with admin access. --Tbma (talk) 19:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uhm, no, I as an admin actually have no more means of verifying this than anybody else. You mean a WP:Checkuser? – Anyway, I just notice that you weren't notified of the WP:ANI thread somebody started about you. Please take a look. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have meant exactly that. Thank you for notifying me, and I have responded there already. --Tbma (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Battle of Tali-Ihantala. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

And, for the record, here's the standard warning for the future:

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you FP --Tbma (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3rr violation[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Posse72 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the complaint at WP:AN3#User:Tbma reported by User:Posse72 (Result: ), regarding the Battle of Tali-Ihantala. To avoid further sanctions, you should respond to the complaint at once and promise to stop edit warring on this article. You and Posse72 have both been notified and blocked under WP:DIGWUREN on a previous occasion. The continued warring may suggest to admins that neither of you is listening, and that more serious action has to be taken. If you will agree not to touch this article for thirty days you may be able to get out of trouble. EdJohnston (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ed. My edits were adding information from the sources, and not reverting somebody' edits. This could be checked from list of editions. The User Posse72 has started to simply reverse them. I have opened 3rr complaint against him already. --Tbma (talk) 22:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This edit from today looks to be a very significant revert (changing 150,000 troops to 60,000). Can you point to a discussion where you got support from other editors for changing that number? EdJohnston (talk) 22:09, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have added this number earlier today [1] from the 2 books that I have in my hands. He simply reverted it, without removing a source books that I've added, because he knows that removal of references will look bad. But that number 150 000 is simply not in those books. --Tbma (talk) 22:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here we discussed it with other editors, and basically what everybody was saying there is that exact numbers are not known, and those are just rough estimates. And that is why I've put a word "estimated" there, that Posse72 later removed. --Tbma (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article ban from Battle of Tali-Ihantala[edit]

I am placing both you and Posse72 under an editing ban from Battle of Tali-Ihantala, per the WP:DIGWUREN discretionary sanctions. This action is being logged at WP:DIGWUREN#Log of blocks and bans. You may still participate in discussions on the article's talk page. If you and Posse72 can come to an agreement on working together to improve the article, the ban can be lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 23:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Agreed --Tbma (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tbma&oldid=1064446768"