User talk:Team61ROLL

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User Martimc123 articles[edit]

The version I created was completely different; rewritten from the start and properly sourced. Every single bit of that article is sourced and that includes several third-party sources that go into detail about the subject. If Masa Kitamiya is the blueprint of the type of article we can expect from you, this isn't going to end well. 95% of that article is unsourced and the sources that are used, are lacking. One is unreliable, one is from Wikipedia and six are just match results. That does not pass WP:GNG. That article could easily be nominated for deletion if someone wanted to. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 22:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, read WP:GNG. This article fails it and that is grounds for deletion. You have no sources here, I assume you have some match results, but just those are not enough. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 23:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team61ROLL, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Team61ROLL! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Articles[edit]

You're adding disambiguators that are not needed. The "(NJPW)" part is pointless, just create the article on top of the redirect. Per MOS:NOPIPE we are supposed to use a direct link and not a piped one. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 23:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guerrillas of Destiny redirects to Guerrillas of Destiny (NJPW) and Meiyu Tag redirects to Meiyu Tag (NJPW). Stop adding the pipe, you're going against MOS:NOPIPE. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 23:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

You need a permission from the person who has taken the photo. You can't just grab a random picture you like from Twitter and upload it. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 21:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can't upload it without a permission. You could find the person who has taken the photo and ask them, but I suggest you just drop it. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 21:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Read Commons:COM:L. If you want to upload an image, you need proof that the author of the image allows it. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 23:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Champion Carnival[edit]

It was already deleted once for that exact reason. That's why I had to completely rewrite it. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 22:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article was also nominated for speedy deletion after I created it, but I managed to save it by showing how different it is to the original one. And now you're trying to turn it back to the version that was deleted. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 22:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is a policy that specifically says that this is not what Wikipedia is for (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK). "Wikipedia is a digital encyclopedia and therefore does not aim to contain all data". リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 22:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Novus (W-1), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 00:51, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of what you've done addresses the reason why the article was deleted. Novus is not notable. The stable lasted for half a year and did nothing in that time. There are some things that simply don't deserve articles. Also you are not allowed to remove the speedy deletion template from articles that you have created yourself. It says so right in the template. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 15:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kumagoro (wrestler), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 23:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep saying you understand the things I tell you, when it's clear you don't? 1. This article was previously deleted via discussion, hence the speedy nomination. 2.DO NOT REMOVE SPEEDY NOMINATION TEMPLATES FROM ARTICLES YOU HAVE CREATED YOURSELF. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 23:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles[edit]

I keep giving you links to guidelines, but you clearly don't know English so it's very hard and extremely frustrating trying to communicate with you. The new Champion Carnival has reliable third-party sources (such as this) that go into detail about the subject. That means that the article passes WP:GNG. Kumagoro doesn't. And frankly, you have created several other articles that I believe would not survive a nomination. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 00:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kobeworldfestival2014.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2014.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kobeworldfestival2015.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2015.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kobeworldfestival2016.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2016.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Dangerousgate2016dg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dangerousgate2016dg.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:DeadorAlive2015DG.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DeadorAlive2015DG.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

You can't upload all these images under non-free use rationales. Usually that rationale is only used for logos and posters, where it is literally impossible to get a free version. Your Verserk images almost certainly fail the rationale and will be deleted. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 00:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Verserk3.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Verserk3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Majora (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hisamaru Tajima) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hisamaru Tajima, Team61ROLL!

Wikipedia editor Ramaksoud2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this article! It appears to be translated from the Spanish Wikipedia. Next time, please follow the attribution instructions at Wikipedia:Translation#How_to_translate. Thank you again!

To reply, leave a comment on Ramaksoud2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Unblock[edit]

@Team61ROLL:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Team61ROLL (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit i removed two speedy deletations but i just did that you blocked me for a year there was no need for that and i promise if you unblock i wont do anything wrong again, so please unblock me, You can ask this to リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) he can confirm that i didnt do anything wrong, he was patroling me.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you are not blocked directly. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions so we can find the block which is affecting you. Yamla (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Team61ROLL: {{unblock|reason=I didnt do anything and someone blocked me for a year. Like i said before and i quote "I admit i removed two speedy deletations but i just did that you blocked me for a year there was no need for that and i promise if you unblock i wont do anything wrong again, so please unblock me, You can ask this to リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) he can confirm that i didnt do anything wrong, he was patroling me." and Yamla (talk) said that i wasnt blocked directly and if i cant edit to follow the instructions but i didn't saw any instructions and i cant edit i should've be able to edit, please help me.}}

We can't help you. You haven't provided us the information about your block. Your account is not blocked. If there is a block, it is on your IP address; you will need to follow the instructions given when you try to edit and are unable to. So, until you attempt an edit, receive those directions, and follow them, we can't help. —C.Fred (talk) 15:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Verserk3.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Verserk3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iron Perms for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iron Perms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Perms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of We Are Team Veteran for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Are Team Veteran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are Team Veteran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 01:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Finlay Jr. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Finlay Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Finlay Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deep Drunkers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deep Drunkers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Drunkers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 01:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Renaissance (professional wrestling) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renaissance (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renaissance (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Over Generation for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Over Generation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over Generation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tribe Vanguard for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tribe Vanguard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribe Vanguard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dia.Hearts for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dia.Hearts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dia.Hearts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Veteran-gun for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veteran-gun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veteran-gun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Real Hazard for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Real Hazard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Hazard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Typhoon (professional wrestling) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Typhoon (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Typhoon (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warriors (professional wrestling) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warriors (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warriors (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pos.Hearts for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pos.Hearts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pos.Hearts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tozawa-juku for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tozawa-juku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tozawa-juku until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of -akatsuki- for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article -akatsuki- is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-akatsuki- until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 15:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jimmyz for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmyz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmyz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monster Express for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monster Express is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster Express until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 15:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World-1 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World-1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World-1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World-1 International for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World-1 International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World-1 International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 15:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florida Express (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Express (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parkywiki (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Team61ROLL (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry. I made a mistake. I just want a second change. Please thrust me again. Best Regards Team61ROLL

Decline reason:

Request unblock on your original account please. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request/help[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Team61ROLL (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry, I want a second chance but I frogot the password of the old account what should I do?

Decline reason:

Did you forget the passwords to the other 60 accounts, too? This is not "a mistake", and you've had chances aplenty. Huon (talk) 17:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request/Explanation Point[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Team61ROLL (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First I forgot my password and I will explain :I did all behavior but it wasn't for vandalism or something bad, I just want to create articles and make wikipedia with the most knowledge ever, but at that time I didn't Know how things were. Now I readed all the guidelines. I want to make a fresh and clean start, without problems.Please give me one more chance and tell me how do I change the password of my original account.

Best Regards

Decline reason:

That doesn't address the issue of whether you created 60 sock puppet accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 01:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Considering the extensive record of socking here, I've revoked your ability to edit this talk page so we can avoid wasting any more time. If you want any chance of being unblocked, stay away for at least six months without any more socking and then make a request at WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GAORA TV logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GAORA TV logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VERZERK15b.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VERZERK15b.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dangerousgate2016dg.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dangerousgate2016dg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeadorAlive2015DG.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeadorAlive2015DG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeadorAlive2016DG.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeadorAlive2016DG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DGOD16.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DGOD16.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GateofDestiny2015.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GateofDestiny2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kobeworldfestival2012.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kobeworldfestival2013.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kobeworldfestival2014.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kobeworldfestival2015.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kobeworldfestival2016.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kobeworldfestival2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]