User talk:Teiresias84/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archived Discussion page for Teiresias84
Please leave any new message here. Thanks.
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The problem was your move created a redirect to the user page. I've tagged the redirect for speedy, but everything else is in order. Rklawton 01:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it's just a single editor article (and autobiographical articles usually are), then I just cut and paste. I add "userfied" to the edit summary, and that pretty much tells the story. The process cuts out a few steps. If you want to do it the other way, then blank out the redir and tag it with db-empty. Cheers, Rklawton 14:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Veara[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Teiresias84! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone reading this should note this was actually given in error, I was mearly tagging this page for speedy deletion.Teiresias84 04:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPWatcher approval[edit]

You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! Martinp23 22:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the dealy in approvals! Martinp23 22:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matmice[edit]

I agree, the matmice page does need work, but there should be one. I knew there should be one, I just didnt' feel like fleshing one out. I'd call it a stub. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eedo Bee (talkcontribs) 08:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the help with the matmice page =) Eedo Bee

I noticed that you voted early on this, and wanted to let you know that the article has substantially grown (and will likely grow further) into a useful list of evidence for the Moon landings that has nothing to do with hoax sites. I'd like to invite you to take another look, and to consider changing your vote. Gravitor 19:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here Ya Go[edit]

In the interest of promoting good cheer and bonhomie, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Victorian election campaign. Grumpyyoungman01 04:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is just to let you know that there is a merge proposal being considered at Independent evidence for Apollo Moon landings. Given that you participated in the AfD debate about this article, you might be interested in leaving your opinion concerning this merge on the talk page. Lunokhod 16:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as you're a Liberal sort of guy, any chance you could jump onto the talk page of this article and give me any comments or suggestions on my latest piece? Cheers. michael talk 03:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my late reply. The article on Thomas Hollway is light on references. It has a suggestion for further reading, but does not provide inline citations and / or sources for most of the information currently within the article itself. I have no complaint with any particular aspect of the article that may require references, it's just the article as a whole lacks any references whatsoever. Having external references at hand along with inline citations helps to verify the information within. -- Longhair\talk 08:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Teiresias84, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Labor logo.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Teiresias84/Drafts/Victorian legislative election, 2002 rewrite. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 13:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Former electorates[edit]

See Talk:Electoral districts of Victoria 136.186.1.188 03:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC) I apologise if I sounded subtle 136.186.1.188 03:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]