User talk:Terrence12690
Welcome!
Hello, Terrence12690, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! CultureDrone (talk) 07:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Puma Swede
A tag has been placed on Puma Swede requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CultureDrone (talk) 07:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Puma Swede, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Puma Swede[edit]
A tag has been placed on Puma Swede requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 09:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Please note that Puma Swede was deleted per editor consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puma Swede. • Gene93k (talk) 09:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Puma Swede source[edit]
Hiya. Unfortunately, I'm not an administrator and therefore don't have access to deleted articles. However, if you have a word with Jimfbleak, who was the administrator who deleted the article, and ask nicely, they can restore a copy of the article onto a subpage out of Wikipedia mainspace where you can store and edit it for future submission. CultureDrone (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- You need to drop a message onto Jimfbleak's talk page here: User_talk:Jimfbleak and ask him if he can restore the article to a subpage so you can work on it. Once that's been done, he'll let you know how to access it. CultureDrone (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll pasted the deleted text here. You may have an uphill job showing that she passes these guidelines. The article has been deleted four times, and you have already been referred to the deletion debate. jimfbleak (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:KAT DEN.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:KAT DEN.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:KAT_DEN.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:KAT_DEN.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 03:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
February 2009[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Puma Swede. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well the part about her on set was taken from the Boobpedia page[1]. And she is tall, blonde, and large busted but I'm a beginner at this so I apologize if I violated Wikipedia policy
Terrence12690 (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well the part about her on set was taken from the Boobpedia page[1]. And she is tall, blonde, and large busted but I'm a beginner at this so I apologize if I violated Wikipedia policy
- Those are just relative terms. It's better to state her actual height and the size of her breasts (which is already in her infobox) than to say she is tall and large breasted. Second, boobpedia is not a reliable source. Anybody can write anything on there without being able to verify whether it's true or not. It's better to have someone like AVN or XBIZ comment on her set behavior. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)