User talk:Terrigentry

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Terrigentry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ubelowme _U ^Me 20:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CertificationPoint[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CertificationPoint requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ubelowme _U ^Me 20:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Terrigentry (talk) 20:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic CertificationPoint. Thank you. Ubelowme _U ^Me 23:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, FYI, blanking warnings, etc., from your talk page or other pages doesn't make them vanish; they're available to anyone who cares to look in the history of the page. Ubelowme _U ^Me 23:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have just deleted (and salted) not only the article, but an attempt to create it at afc, which was equally entirely promotional spam DGG ( talk ) 23:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing deletion templates[edit]

Hello. I am sorry that you feel that your article should not be deleted, but as the article author you should not remove the deletion notice others have put up; as Ubelowme has previously told you, you may have your account blocked if you keep removing the templates. You should still feel free to express your opinions at Talk:CertificationPoint, but I'm afraid that article has been deleted because notability is not established by the citation of reliable sources. You can give your article much better chances at survival if you bring up such sources the next time you create it. Thanks.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]