User talk:Tester299999999bot

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, API, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Adakiko, I was adding the source meanwhile you have erased it. The source give more detailed information about why APIs allow to increase the operational efficiency, allowing to reduce the three fundamental variables of CAPEX/OPEX theory. Tester299999999bot (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source has a domain authority = 78 (Semrush data). Tester299999999bot (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please @Adakiko can you re-add it? Tester299999999bot (talk) 09:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's saved in the wp:page history. Please add citations with your edits. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. (To avoid the possibility of a surprisingly common misunderstanding, editing is part of paid work if it is done as part of normal employment or as part of a work to a contract, whether or not a specific payment earmarked for editing Wikipedia is made.) Also editingto advertise, publicise, or promote anything is not permitted. Furthermore, user names ending in "bot" are reserved for registered bot accounts, and since your account isn't one, you must not continue to edit under your current username. JBW (talk) 09:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW I'm not connected to the brand or business Tanaza. Objectively, if that company is the only example on the market to mention and to have similar APIs for cloud networking interoperability, cannot I mention it? It's not advertising. It's the reality.

Please, tell me how I can change my nickname to avoid to be filtered as bot. Tester299999999bot (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW When I will discover similar companies (also competitors) I will add further examples to show you that I have not conflict of interest with them. Tester299999999bot (talk) 09:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Tester299999999bot, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tester299999999bot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Testing3456 (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; the new account has been created, and there's no reason for this one to be unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello @Cabayi, can you please remove the block from my account? I have changed the name nickname of the account from Tester299999999bot to Testing3456 Testing3456 (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]